Kaufman Kenton R, Levine James A, Brey Robert H, McCrady Shelly K, Padgett Denny J, Joyner Michael J
Motion Analysis Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jul;89(7):1380-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.053.
To quantify the energy efficiency of locomotion and free-living physical activity energy expenditure of transfemoral amputees using a mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee.
Repeated-measures design to evaluate comparative functional outcomes.
Exercise physiology laboratory and community free-living environment.
Subjects (N=15; 12 men, 3 women; age, 42+/-9 y; range, 26-57 y) with transfemoral amputation.
Research participants were long-term users of a mechanical prosthesis (20+/-10 y as an amputee; range, 3-36 y). They were fitted with a microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis and allowed to acclimate (mean time, 18+/-8 wk) before being retested.
Objective measurements of energy efficiency and total daily energy expenditure were obtained. The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was used to gather subjective feedback from the participants.
Subjects demonstrated significantly increased physical activity-related energy expenditure levels in the participant's free-living environment (P=.04) after wearing the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint. There was no significant difference in the energy efficiency of walking (P=.34). When using the microprocessor-controlled knee, the subjects expressed increased satisfaction in their daily lives (P=.02).
People ambulating with a microprocessor-controlled knee significantly increased their physical activity during daily life, outside the laboratory setting, and expressed an increased quality of life.
使用机械和微处理器控制的假肢膝关节,量化经股截肢者的运动能量效率和自由生活状态下的体力活动能量消耗。
重复测量设计以评估比较性功能结果。
运动生理学实验室和社区自由生活环境。
经股截肢的受试者(N = 15;12名男性,3名女性;年龄,42±9岁;范围,26 - 57岁)。
研究参与者是机械假肢的长期使用者(作为截肢者使用20±10年;范围,3 - 36年)。他们佩戴微处理器控制的膝关节假肢并适应一段时间(平均时间,18±8周)后再次进行测试。
获得能量效率和每日总能量消耗的客观测量值。使用假肢评估问卷收集参与者的主观反馈。
佩戴微处理器控制的膝关节假肢后,受试者在自由生活环境中的体力活动相关能量消耗水平显著增加(P = 0.04)。步行的能量效率没有显著差异(P = 0.34)。使用微处理器控制的膝关节时,受试者对日常生活的满意度增加(P = 0.02)。
使用微处理器控制膝关节行走的人在实验室外的日常生活中体力活动显著增加,并且生活质量有所提高。