Ganguli Rohan, Brar Jaspreet S, Mahmoud Ramy, Berry Sally A, Pandina Gahan J
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2593, USA.
BMC Med. 2008 Jun 30;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-6-17.
In clinical practice, physicians often need to change the antipsychotic medications they give to patients because of an inadequate response or the presence of unacceptable or unsafe side effects. However, there is a lack of consensus in the field as to the optimal switching strategy for antipsychotics, especially with regards to the speed at which the dose of the previous antipsychotic should be reduced. This paper assesses the short-term results of strategies for the discontinuation of olanzapine when initiating risperidone.
In a 6-week, randomized, open-label, rater-blinded study, patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, on a stable drug dose for more than 30 days at entry, who were intolerant of or exhibiting a suboptimal symptom response to more than 30 days of olanzapine treatment, were randomly assigned to the following switch strategies (common risperidone initiation scheme; varying olanzapine discontinuation): (i) abrupt strategy, where olanzapine was discontinued at risperidone initiation; (ii) gradual 1 strategy, where olanzapine was given at 50% entry dose for 1 week after risperidone initiation and then discontinued; or (iii) gradual 2 strategy, where olanzapine was given at 100% entry dose for 1 week, then at 50% in the second week, and then discontinued.
The study enrolled 123 patients on stable doses of olanzapine. Their mean age was 40.3 years and mean (+/- standard deviation (SD)) baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 75.6 +/- 11.5. All-cause treatment discontinuation was lowest (12%) in the group with the slowest olanzapine dose reduction (gradual 2) and occurred at half the discontinuation rate in the other two groups (25% in abrupt and 28% in gradual 1). The relative risk of early discontinuation was 0.77 (confidence interval 0.61-0.99) for the slowest dose reduction compared with the other two strategies. After the medication was changed, improvements at endpoint were seen in PANSS total score (-7.3; p < 0.0001) and in PANSS positive (-3.0; p < 0.0001), negative (-0.9; p = 0.171) and anxiety/depression (-1.4; p = 0.0005) subscale scores. Severity of movement disorders and weight changes were minimal.
When switching patients from olanzapine to risperidone, a gradual reduction in the dose of olanzapine over 2 weeks was associated with higher rates of retention compared with abrupt or less gradual discontinuation. Switching via any strategy was associated with significant improvements in positive and anxiety symptoms and was generally well tolerated.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00378183.
在临床实践中,由于疗效不佳或出现不可接受的不安全副作用,医生常常需要更换给予患者的抗精神病药物。然而,该领域对于抗精神病药物的最佳换药策略缺乏共识,尤其是关于前一种抗精神病药物剂量应降低的速度。本文评估了在起始利培酮时停用奥氮平的策略的短期结果。
在一项为期6周的随机、开放标签、评估者盲法研究中,入组的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者在入组时服用稳定药物剂量超过30天,对奥氮平治疗超过30天不耐受或症状反应欠佳,将其随机分配至以下换药策略(常见的利培酮起始方案;不同的奥氮平停药方式):(i)突然停药策略,在起始利培酮时停用奥氮平;(ii)逐渐减量1策略,在起始利培酮后,奥氮平以起始剂量的50%服用1周,然后停药;或(iii)逐渐减量2策略,奥氮平在第1周以起始剂量的100%服用,第2周以50%服用,然后停药。
该研究纳入了123例服用稳定剂量奥氮平的患者。他们的平均年龄为40.3岁,阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分的平均(±标准差)基线值为75.6±11.5。奥氮平剂量降低最慢的组(逐渐减量2)全因治疗停药率最低(12%),另外两组的停药率是该组的两倍(突然停药组为25%,逐渐减量1组为28%)。与其他两种策略相比,剂量降低最慢的组早期停药的相对风险为0.77(置信区间0.61 - 0.99)。换药后,PANSS总分(-7.3;p < 0.0001)以及PANSS阳性(-3.0;p < 0.0001)、阴性(-0.9;p = 0.171)和焦虑/抑郁(-1.4;p = 0.0005)分量表得分在终点时均有改善。运动障碍的严重程度和体重变化最小。
当患者从奥氮平换用利培酮时,与突然停药或减量不那么缓慢相比,在2周内逐渐降低奥氮平剂量与更高的维持率相关。通过任何策略换药均与阳性和焦虑症状的显著改善相关,且总体耐受性良好。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00378183