Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症门诊患者由奥氮平换用利培酮或反之的临床后果:来自世界精神分裂症门诊患者健康结局(W-SOHO)研究的 36 个月结果。

Clinical consequences of switching from olanzapine to risperidone and vice versa in outpatients with schizophrenia: 36-month results from the Worldwide Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (W-SOHO) study.

机构信息

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 4;12:218. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-218.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With many atypical antipsychotics now available in the market, it has become a common clinical practice to switch between atypical agents as a means of achieving the best clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of switching from olanzapine to risperidone and vice versa on clinical status and tolerability outcomes in outpatients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic setting.

METHODS

W-SOHO was a 3-year observational study that involved over 17,000 outpatients with schizophrenia from 37 countries worldwide. The present post hoc study focused on the subgroup of patients who started taking olanzapine at baseline and subsequently made the first switch to risperidone (n=162) and vice versa (n=136). Clinical status was assessed at the visit when the first switch was made (i.e. before switching) and after switching. Logistic regression models examined the impact of medication switch on tolerability outcomes, and linear regression models assessed the association between medication switch and change in the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH) overall score or change in weight. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to analyze the time to medication switch as well as time to relapse (symptom worsening as assessed by the CGI-SCH scale or hospitalization).

RESULTS

48% and 39% of patients switching to olanzapine and risperidone, respectively, remained on the medication without further switches (p=0.019). Patients switching to olanzapine were significantly less likely to experience relapse (hazard ratio: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.43, 8.26), extrapyramidal symptoms (odds ratio [OR]: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.49, 10.89) and amenorrhea/galactorrhea (OR: 8.99, 95% CI: 2.30, 35.13). No significant difference in weight change was, however, found between the two groups. While the CGI-SCH overall score improved in both groups after switching, there was a significantly greater change in those who switched to olanzapine (difference of 0.29 points, p=0.013).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that patients who switched from risperidone to olanzapine were likely to experience a more favorable treatment course than those who switched from olanzapine to risperidone. Given the nature of observational study design and small sample size, additional studies are warranted.

摘要

背景

目前市场上有许多非典型抗精神病药物,因此,医生常通过转换药物来实现最佳临床效果。本研究旨在观察在自然环境下,精神分裂症门诊患者从奥氮平转换为利培酮或反之,对临床状态和耐受性结局的影响。

方法

W-SOHO 是一项为期 3 年的观察性研究,共纳入来自全球 37 个国家的 17000 余名精神分裂症门诊患者。本事后分析研究集中于基线时开始服用奥氮平、随后首次转换为利培酮的患者亚组(n=162)和转换相反药物的患者亚组(n=136)。在首次转换时的就诊时(即转换前)和转换后评估临床状态。逻辑回归模型检查药物转换对耐受性结局的影响,线性回归模型评估药物转换与临床总体印象-精神分裂症量表(CGI-SCH)总分变化或体重变化之间的关联。此外,Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和 Cox 比例风险模型用于分析药物转换时间和复发时间(CGI-SCH 量表评估的症状恶化或住院)。

结果

分别有 48%和 39%转换为奥氮平和利培酮的患者(p=0.019)未再转换药物。转换为奥氮平的患者复发的风险显著降低(风险比:3.43,95%CI:1.43,8.26),出现锥体外系症状(比值比 [OR]:4.02,95%CI:1.49,10.89)和闭经/溢乳(OR:8.99,95%CI:2.30,35.13)的可能性更小。然而,两组之间的体重变化无显著差异。两组患者转换后 CGI-SCH 总分均有所改善,但转换为奥氮平的患者改善更为显著(差值为 0.29 分,p=0.013)。

结论

本研究表明,与转换为奥氮平的患者相比,从利培酮转换为奥氮平的患者更可能获得更有利的治疗结果。鉴于观察性研究设计的性质和样本量较小,还需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e71c/3536691/84aaaf2b6013/1471-244X-12-218-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验