Suppr超能文献

高效液相色谱法与酶放大免疫测定技术在监测小儿肾移植受者霉酚酸中的比较

Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique to monitor mycophenolic acid in paediatric renal recipients.

作者信息

Irtan Sabine, Azougagh Said, Monchaud Caroline, Popon Michel, Baudouin Véronique, Jacqz-Aigrain Evelyne

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Hôpital Robert Debré, 75019, Paris, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 2008 Oct;23(10):1859-65. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0877-z. Epub 2008 Jul 2.

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is recommended to guide immunosuppression. High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) or the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), used to measure mycophenolic acid (MPA) were compared in an exclusive paediatric renal transplant population. Twenty patients were included as part of the pharmacokinetics study of MMF, and 88 additional samples were drawn for TDM. Agreement between HPLC-UV and EMIT was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. With the two methods, pre-dose concentrations were not normally distributed. After logarithmic transformation, their mean was 0.79 +/- 1.16 microg ml(-1) and their mean difference was 0.34 +/- 0.16 microg ml(-1) [95% confidence interval (95%CI 0.30-0.38 microg ml(-1), with antilogarithmic values of these limits of 1.34-1.46 microg ml(-1)). Area under the curve (AUC)(HPLC) and AUC(EMIT) were normally distributed. Their mean was 52.42 +/- 25.91 mg x h/l and their mean difference was 15.22 +/- 8 mg x h/l (95%CI 11.99-18.45 mg x h/l), the Bland-Altman plot showing a bias proportional to the mean. Our data showed the absence of agreement between the HPLC and EMIT methods, with an average positive bias of 15% with the EMIT. Further studies are required to determine which method is best appropriate for TDM of MMF in children.

摘要

推荐进行霉酚酸酯(MMF)的治疗药物监测(TDM)以指导免疫抑制。在一个专门的儿科肾移植人群中,对用于测量霉酚酸(MPA)的高效液相色谱 - 紫外检测法(HPLC - UV)和酶放大免疫分析技术(EMIT)进行了比较。20名患者作为MMF药代动力学研究的一部分被纳入,另外抽取了88份样本用于TDM。采用Bland - Altman方法评估HPLC - UV和EMIT之间的一致性。使用这两种方法时,给药前浓度不呈正态分布。经对数转换后,其均值为0.79±1.16μg/ml,平均差异为0.34±0.16μg/ml[95%置信区间(95%CI 0.30 - 0.38μg/ml),这些限值的反对数值为1.34 - 1.46μg/ml]。曲线下面积(AUC)(HPLC)和AUC(EMIT)呈正态分布。其均值为52.42±25.91mg·h/l,平均差异为15.22±8mg·h/l(95%CI 11.99 - 18.45mg·h/l),Bland - Altman图显示偏差与均值成比例。我们的数据表明HPLC和EMIT方法之间缺乏一致性,EMIT平均正偏差为15%。需要进一步研究以确定哪种方法最适合儿童MMF的TDM。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验