On the applied use of progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.
作者信息
Roane Henry S
机构信息
Munroe-Meyer Institute, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):155-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-155.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
On the applied use of progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):155-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-155.
2
Progressive-ratio schedules and applied behavior analysis.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Summer;43(2):347-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-347.
3
Operant conditioning.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:115-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145124. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
4
Effects of ratio reinforcement schedules on choice behavior.
J Gen Psychol. 1990 Jan;117(1):99-106. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1990.9917777.
5
Choice and conditioned reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):177-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-177.
6
The effects of reinforcement magnitude on skill acquisition for children with autism.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Dec;48(4):924-9. doi: 10.1002/jaba.239. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
7
Reinforcing efficacy of interactions with preferred and nonpreferred staff under progressive-ratio schedules.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):221-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-221.
8
Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):163-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-163.
9
Effects of a freely available response on the schedule performance of mentally retarded persons.
Am J Ment Retard. 1989 Jan;93(4):373-9.
10
A review of recent studies on differential reinforcement during skill acquisition in early intervention.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Summer;43(2):351-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-351.
引用本文的文献
1
Developing a Preference Scale for a Bear: From "Bearly Like" to "Like Beary Much".
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 6;13(9):1554. doi: 10.3390/ani13091554.
2
Use of experimental medicine approaches for the development of novel psychiatric treatments based on orexin receptor modulation.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Apr;147:105107. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105107. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
The Effects of Drugs on Behavior Maintained by Social Contact: Role of Monoamines in Social Reinforcement.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 21;15:805139. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.805139. eCollection 2021.
4
Prenatal metal mixture concentrations and reward motivation in children.
Neurotoxicology. 2022 Jan;88:124-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
5
Analysis of unexpected disruptive effects of contingent food reinforcement on automatically maintained self-injury.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Feb;55(1):62-79. doi: 10.1002/jaba.875. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
A Touchscreen Motivation Assessment Evaluated in Huntington's Disease Patients and R6/1 Model Mice.
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 9;10:858. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00858. eCollection 2019.
7
Children with Autism show Atypical Preference for Non-social Stimuli.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 17;9(1):10355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46705-8.
8
Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Developmental exposure to low level ambient ultrafine particle air pollution and cognitive dysfunction.
Neurotoxicology. 2018 Dec;69:217-231. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
Treatment of Escape-Maintained Challenging Behavior Using Chained Schedules: An Evaluation of the Effects of Thinning Positive plus Negative Reinforcement During Functional Communication Training.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2016;62(3):147-156. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2016.1176308. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
本文引用的文献
1
Reinforcing efficacy of interactions with preferred and nonpreferred staff under progressive-ratio schedules.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):221-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-221.
2
Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):203-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-203.
3
Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-189.
4
Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response patterns.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):177-88. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-177.
5
Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):163-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-163.
6
An evaluation of stimulant medication on the reinforcing effects of play.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;41(1):143-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-143.
7
Applying the behavioral economics principle of unit price to DRO schedule thinning.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):529-34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-529.
8
Evaluating the influence of postsession reinforcement on choice of reinforcers.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):515-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-515.
9
A unit price evaluation of severe problem behavior.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):463-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-463.
10
Some effects of stimulant medication on response allocation: a double-blind analysis.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):243-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.24-05.
Zotero 插件