• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Choice and conditioned reinforcement.选择与条件强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):177-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-177.
2
Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.条件强化值与选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):155-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-155.
3
Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.程序变化对同时链中选择反应的一些影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Nov;92(3):345-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-345.
4
Evidence against a constant-difference effect in concurrent-chains schedules.反对并发链程序中恒定差异效应的证据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Mar;77(2):147-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-147.
5
Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.在可靠和不可靠结果之间进行选择:并发链中的混合百分比强化
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):57-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-57.
6
A molecular analysis of choice on concurrent-chains schedules.并发链程序表选择的分子分析
J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):145-59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-145.
7
Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.具有不确定结果的选择:条件强化效应
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):201-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-201.
8
Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.百分比强化程序中的次优选择:信号条件和终段长度的影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):219-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-219.
9
Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers.同时链日程安排作为一种研究与酒精相关的条件性强化物之间选择的方法。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):71-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-71.
10
Delay reduction and optimal foraging: variable-ratio search in a foraging analogue.减少延迟与最优觅食:觅食模拟中的可变比率搜索
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):465-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-465.

引用本文的文献

1
Choice, conditioned reinforcement, and the prius effect.选择、条件性强化与普锐斯效应。
Behav Anal. 2008 Fall;31(2):95-111. doi: 10.1007/BF03392164.
2
Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.观察与关注的定量分析。
Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):145-57. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
3
The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.条件强化率对选择的影响:综述
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):409-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.44-06.
4
Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.不同强化时间表可及性对人类选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Sep;62(2):269-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-269.
5
Delay reduction: current status.减少延迟:当前状况
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):159-69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-159.

本文引用的文献

1
Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.非人类的短期记忆:对部分研究结果的定量再分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):409-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-409.
2
Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction.人类观察:由与强化相关但与消退无关的刺激维持。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):193-210. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-193.
3
Choice: Some quantitative relations.选择:一些定量关系。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):1-13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-1.
4
Choice and the relative immediacy of reinforcement.选择与强化的相对即时性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):321-6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-321.
5
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.激励理论:二、选择模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):217-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217.
6
Choice and foraging.选择与觅食。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):117-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-117.
7
Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement.大鼠在同时链安排中的选择行为:强化物的数量和延迟。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):383-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-383.
8
The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.条件强化和惩罚的延迟减少假说:观察行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):93-108. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-93.
9
Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.经济行为分析的概念。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219-38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219.
10
Conditioned reinforcement and choice.条件强化与选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):135-48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-135.

选择与条件强化。

Choice and conditioned reinforcement.

作者信息

Fantino E, Freed D, Preston R A, Williams W A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0109.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):177-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-177.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1991.55-177
PMID:2037826
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1323053/
Abstract

A potential weakness of one formulation of delay-reduction theory is its failure to include a term for rate of conditioned reinforcement, that is, the rate at which the terminal-link stimuli occur in concurrent-chains schedules. The present studies assessed whether or not rate of conditioned reinforcement has an independent effect upon choice. Pigeons responded on either modified concurrent-chains schedules or on comparable concurrent-tandem schedules. The initial link was shortened on only one of two concurrent-chains schedules and on only one of two corresponding concurrent-tandem schedules. This manipulation increased rate of conditioned reinforcement sharply in the chain but not in the tandem schedule. According to a formulation of delay-reduction theory, when the outcomes chosen (the terminal links) are equal, as in Experiment 1, choice should depend only on rate of primary reinforcement; thus, choice should be equivalent for the tandem and chain schedules despite a large difference in rate of conditioned reinforcement. When the outcomes chosen are unequal, however, as in Experiment 2, choice should depend upon both rate of primary reinforcement and relative signaled delay reduction; thus, larger preferences should occur in the chain than in the tandem schedules. These predictions were confirmed, suggesting that increasing the rate of conditioned reinforcement on concurrent-chains schedules may have no independent effect on choice.

摘要

延迟减少理论的一种表述方式的一个潜在弱点在于,它没有纳入条件强化率这一术语,也就是说,在并发链程序中最终环节刺激出现的速率。本研究评估了条件强化率是否对选择有独立影响。鸽子在修改后的并发链程序或可比的并发串联程序上做出反应。在两个并发链程序中的仅一个以及两个相应的并发串联程序中的仅一个上缩短了初始环节。这种操作在链程序中大幅提高了条件强化率,但在串联程序中却没有。根据延迟减少理论的一种表述,当所选择的结果(最终环节)相等时,如在实验1中,选择应该仅取决于初级强化率;因此,尽管条件强化率有很大差异,串联程序和链程序的选择应该是等效的。然而,当所选择的结果不相等时,如在实验2中,选择应该取决于初级强化率和相对信号延迟减少;因此,链程序中的偏好应该比串联程序中更大。这些预测得到了证实,表明在并发链程序上提高条件强化率可能对选择没有独立影响。