Avilés Jesús M
Departamento de Biología Animal y Ecología, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Oct 22;275(1649):2345-52. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0720.
Some parasite cuckoo species lay eggs that, to the human eye, appear to mimic the appearance of the eggs of their favourite hosts, which hinders discrimination and removal of their eggs by host species. Hitherto, perception of cuckoo-host egg mimicry has been estimated based on human vision or spectrophotometry, which does not account for what the receivers' eye (i.e. hosts) actually discriminates. Using a discrimination model approach that reproduces host retinal functioning, and museum egg collections collected in the south of Finland, where at least six different races of the European cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) coexist, I first assess whether the colour design of cuckoo eggs of different races maximizes matching for two favourite avian hosts, viz. the redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) and the pied wagtail (Motacilla alba). Second, I assess the role of nest luminosity on host perception of mimicry by the same two hosts. Phoenicurus-cuckoo eggs showed a better chromatic matching with the redstart-host eggs than other cuckoo races, and in most cases can not be discriminated. Sylvia-cuckoo eggs, however, showed better achromatic matching with redstart-host eggs than Phoenicurus-cuckoo eggs. Also, Motacilla-cuckoo eggs showed poorer chromatic and achromatic matching with pied wagtail-host eggs than Sylvia-cuckoo eggs. Nest luminosity affected chromatic and achromatic differences between cuckoo and host eggs, although only minimally affected the proportion of cuckoo eggs discriminated by chromatic signals. These results reveal that cuckoo races as assessed by humans do not entirely match with host perception of matching and that achromatic mechanisms could play a main role in the discrimination of cuckoo eggs at low-light levels.
一些寄生性杜鹃物种所产的卵,在人眼看来,似乎模仿了它们最喜爱宿主的卵的外观,这妨碍了宿主物种辨别并移除这些卵。迄今为止,对杜鹃-宿主卵拟态的认知一直是基于人类视觉或分光光度法来估计的,而这并未考虑接收者(即宿主)的眼睛实际能辨别的是什么。我采用一种再现宿主视网膜功能的辨别模型方法,并利用在芬兰南部收集的博物馆卵藏品(那里至少有六种不同的欧洲杜鹃(普通杜鹃)种族共存),首先评估不同种族的杜鹃卵的颜色设计是否能最大程度地与两种最喜爱的鸟类宿主(即红尾鸲(红尾鸲)和白鹡鸰(白鹡鸰))的卵相匹配。其次,我评估巢穴光照度对这两种宿主对拟态的感知所起的作用。红尾鸲-杜鹃卵与红尾鸲宿主卵相比,在色度匹配上比其他杜鹃种族更好,并且在大多数情况下无法被辨别出来。然而,林莺-杜鹃卵与红尾鸲宿主卵相比,在消色差匹配上比红尾鸲-杜鹃卵更好。此外,白鹡鸰-杜鹃卵与白鹡鸰宿主卵相比,在色度和消色差匹配上比林莺-杜鹃卵更差。巢穴光照度影响了杜鹃卵与宿主卵之间的色度和消色差差异,尽管仅对通过色度信号辨别出的杜鹃卵比例产生了极小的影响。这些结果表明,人类评估的杜鹃种族与宿主对匹配的感知并不完全相符,并且消色差机制可能在低光照水平下杜鹃卵的辨别中起主要作用。