Hartman Mary, Watson Robert Scott, Linde-Zwirble Walter, Clermont Gilles, Lave Judith, Weissfeld Lisa, Kochanek Patrick, Angus Derek
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke Children's Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e172-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3399.
Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death in children. On the basis of evidence of better outcomes, the American College of Surgery Committee on Trauma recommends that children with severe traumatic brain injury receive care at high-level trauma centers. We assessed rates of adherence to these recommendations and factors associated with adherence.
We studied population and hospital discharge data from 2001 from all of the health care referral regions (n = 68) in 6 US states (Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Virginia). We identified children with severe traumatic brain injury by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes and American College of Surgery Committee on Trauma criteria. We defined "high-level centers" as either level I or pediatric trauma centers. We considered an area to be well regionalized if >or=90% of severe traumatic brain injury hospitalizations were in high-level centers. We also explored how use of level II trauma centers affected rates of care at high-level centers.
Of 2117 admissions for severe pediatric traumatic brain injury, 67.3% were in high-level centers, and 87.3% were in either high-level or level II centers. Among states, 56.4% to 93.6% of severe traumatic brain injury admissions were in high-level centers. Only 2 states, Massachusetts and Virginia, were well regionalized. Across health care referral regions, 0% to 100% of severe traumatic brain injury admissions were in high-level centers, and only 19.1% of health care referral regions were well regionalized. Only a weak relationship existed between the distance to the nearest high-level center and regionalization. The age of statewide trauma systems had no relationship to the extent of regionalization.
Despite evidence for improved outcomes of severely injured children admitted to high-level trauma centers, we found that almost one third of the children with severe traumatic brain injury failed to receive care in such centers. Only 2 of 6 states and less than one fifth of 68 health care referral regions were well regionalized. This study highlights problems with current pediatric trauma care that can serve as a basis for additional research and health care policy.
创伤性脑损伤是儿童死亡的主要原因。基于预后较好的证据,美国外科医师学会创伤委员会建议,重度创伤性脑损伤患儿应在高级创伤中心接受治疗。我们评估了对这些建议的遵循率以及与遵循相关的因素。
我们研究了2001年美国6个州(佛罗里达州、马萨诸塞州、新泽西州、纽约州、得克萨斯州和弗吉尼亚州)所有医疗转诊地区(n = 68)的人口和医院出院数据。我们使用国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本编码和美国外科医师学会创伤委员会标准来确定重度创伤性脑损伤患儿。我们将“高级中心”定义为一级或儿科创伤中心。如果≥90%的重度创伤性脑损伤住院病例在高级中心,我们认为该地区区域划分良好。我们还探讨了二级创伤中心的使用如何影响高级中心的治疗率。
在2117例重度儿科创伤性脑损伤入院病例中,67.3%在高级中心,87.3%在高级或二级中心。在各州中,56.4%至93.6%的重度创伤性脑损伤入院病例在高级中心。只有马萨诸塞州和弗吉尼亚州这2个州区域划分良好。在所有医疗转诊地区,0%至100%的重度创伤性脑损伤入院病例在高级中心,只有19.1%的医疗转诊地区区域划分良好。到最近高级中心的距离与区域划分之间仅存在微弱关系。全州创伤系统的年限与区域划分程度无关。
尽管有证据表明入住高级创伤中心的重伤儿童预后有所改善,但我们发现近三分之一的重度创伤性脑损伤患儿未能在这类中心接受治疗。6个州中只有2个州,68个医疗转诊地区中不到五分之一区域划分良好。这项研究凸显了当前儿科创伤护理存在的问题,可为进一步研究和医疗政策提供依据。