Okelo Sande O, Patino Cecilia M, Riekert Kristin A, Merriman Barry, Bilderback Andrew, Hansel Nadia N, Thompson Kathy, Thompson Jennifer, Quartey Ruth, Rand Cynthia S, Diette Gregory B
Department of Pediatrics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-0005, USA.
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e195-201. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2271.
Although asthma is often inappropriately treated in children, little is known about what information pediatricians use to adjust asthma therapy. The purpose of this work was to assess the importance of various dimensions of patient asthma status as the basis of pediatrician treatment decisions.
We conducted a cross-sectional, random-sample survey, between November 2005 and May 2006, of 500 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics using standardized case vignettes. Vignettes varied in regard to (1) acute health care use (hospitalized 6 months ago), (2) bother (parent bothered by the child's asthma status), (3) control (frequency of symptoms and albuterol use), (4) direction (qualitative change in symptoms), and (5) wheezing during physical examination. Our primary outcome was the proportion of pediatricians who would adjust treatment in the presence or absence of these 5 factors.
Physicians used multiple dimensions of asthma status other than symptoms to determine treatment. Pediatricians were significantly more likely to increase treatment for a recently hospitalized patient (45% vs 18%), a bothered parent (67% vs 18%), poorly controlled symptoms (4-5 times per week; 100% vs 18%), or if there was wheezing on examination (45% vs 18%) compared with patients who only had well-controlled symptoms. Pediatricians were significantly less likely to decrease treatment for a child with well-controlled symptoms and recent hospitalization (28%), parents who reported being bothered (43%), or a child whose symptoms had worsened since the last doctor visit (10%) compared with children with well-controlled symptoms alone.
Pediatricians treat asthma on the basis of multiple dimensions of asthma status, including hospitalization, bother, symptom frequency, direction, and wheezing but use these factors differently to increase and decrease treatment. Tools that systematically assess multiple dimensions of asthma may be useful to help further improve pediatric asthma care.
尽管儿童哮喘常常未得到恰当治疗,但对于儿科医生用于调整哮喘治疗的信息却知之甚少。本研究旨在评估患者哮喘状况的各个维度作为儿科医生治疗决策依据的重要性。
2005年11月至2006年5月期间,我们使用标准化病例 vignettes 对500名美国儿科学会成员进行了横断面随机抽样调查。vignettes 在以下方面存在差异:(1)急性医疗保健使用情况(6个月前住院),(2)困扰程度(家长因孩子的哮喘状况而困扰),(3)控制情况(症状发作频率和使用沙丁胺醇的情况),(4)变化趋势(症状的定性变化),以及(5)体格检查时的喘息情况。我们的主要结局是在存在或不存在这5个因素的情况下,会调整治疗方案的儿科医生的比例。
医生除了症状之外,还会使用哮喘状况的多个维度来确定治疗方案。与症状控制良好的患者相比,儿科医生更有可能为近期住院的患者(45%对18%)、家长感到困扰的患者(67%对18%)、症状控制不佳(每周4 - 5次;100%对18%)或体格检查时有喘息的患者(45%对18%)增加治疗。与仅症状控制良好的儿童相比,儿科医生为症状控制良好但近期住院的儿童(28%)、报告受到困扰的家长(43%)或自上次就诊后症状恶化的儿童(10%)减少治疗的可能性显著降低。
儿科医生基于哮喘状况的多个维度来治疗哮喘,包括住院情况、困扰程度、症状发作频率、变化趋势和喘息情况,但在增加和减少治疗时对这些因素的使用方式有所不同。系统评估哮喘多个维度的工具可能有助于进一步改善儿科哮喘护理。