• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Do Perceptions of Asthma Control and Severity Relate to Indicators of Asthma Status and Treatment Recommendations by Pediatricians?儿童对哮喘控制和严重程度的认知与哮喘状态指标及儿科医生的治疗建议有何关联?
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2012 Mar;25(1):17-23. doi: 10.1089/ped.2011.0107.
2
Patient factors used by pediatricians to assign asthma treatment.儿科医生用于确定哮喘治疗方案的患者因素。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e195-201. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2271.
3
Patient factors that physicians use to assign asthma treatment.医生用于确定哮喘治疗方案的患者因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 9;167(13):1360-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1360.
4
Primary care clinician adherence with asthma guidelines: the National Asthma Survey of Physicians.基层医疗临床医生对哮喘指南的遵循情况:全国医师哮喘调查
J Asthma. 2020 May;57(5):543-555. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1579831. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Leukotriene modifier use and asthma severity: how is a new medication being used by adults with asthma?白三烯调节剂的使用与哮喘严重程度:成年哮喘患者如何使用一种新药?
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 22;164(6):617-22. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.617.
6
Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007.专家小组报告3(EPR-3):哮喘诊断和管理指南——2007年总结报告
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5 Suppl):S94-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.043.
7
Association between Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis Severity in the Context of Asthma Control.哮喘控制背景下哮喘与慢性鼻-鼻窦炎严重程度的相关性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb;158(2):386-390. doi: 10.1177/0194599817728920. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
8
Barriers to Prescribing Controller Anti Inflammatory Medication among Puerto Rican Asthmatic Children with Public Insurance: Results of National Survey of Pediatricians.公共保险覆盖的波多黎各哮喘儿童在使用控制炎症药物方面的处方障碍:儿科医生全国调查结果
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2010 Nov 1;23(3):169-174. doi: 10.1089/ped.2010.0023.
9
A potential pitfall in provider assessments of the quality of asthma control.医疗服务提供者对哮喘控制质量进行评估时的一个潜在陷阱。
Ambul Pediatr. 2003 Mar-Apr;3(2):102-5. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0102:appipa>2.0.co;2.
10
Self-reported physician practices for children with asthma: are national guidelines followed?针对哮喘儿童的自我报告的医生诊疗行为:是否遵循了国家指南?
Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4 Suppl):886-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Asthma treatment decisions by pediatric residents do not consistently conform to guidelines or improve with level of training.儿科住院医师做出的哮喘治疗决策并不始终符合指南要求,也不会随着培训水平的提高而改善。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 May-Jun;14(3):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
2
Validation of parental reports of asthma trajectory, burden, and risk by using the pediatric asthma control and communication instrument.使用儿科哮喘控制和交流工具验证父母报告的哮喘轨迹、负担和风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Mar-Apr;2(2):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.10.005. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
3
The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument asthma questionnaire: for use in diverse children of all ages.儿科哮喘控制与交流工具哮喘问卷:适用于各年龄段的不同儿童。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jul;132(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-physician discordance in assessments of global disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis.患者与医生对类风湿关节炎整体疾病严重程度评估的不一致性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Jun;62(6):857-64. doi: 10.1002/acr.20132.
2
Relationship of asthma control to asthma exacerbations using surrogate markers within a managed care database.在管理式医疗数据库中使用替代标志物评估哮喘控制与哮喘加重的关系。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 May;16(5):327-33.
3
Which pediatricians are providing care to America's children? An update on the trends and changes during the past 26 years.哪些儿科医生在为美国儿童提供医疗服务?过去 26 年趋势和变化的最新情况。
J Pediatr. 2010 Jul;157(1):148-152.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
4
A current picture of asthma diagnosis, severity, and control in a low-income minority preteen population.低收入少数族裔青春期前儿童群体中哮喘诊断、严重程度及控制情况的现状
J Asthma. 2010 Mar;47(2):150-5. doi: 10.3109/02770900903483824.
5
Decision-making for and impact of early immunomodulatory treatment: the Austrian Clinically Isolated Syndrome Study (ACISS).早期免疫调节治疗的决策和影响:奥地利临床孤立综合征研究(ACISS)。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jun 1;17(6):852-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02943.x. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
6
Re: A new perspective on concepts of asthma severity and control.关于:哮喘严重程度和控制概念的新视角。
Eur Respir J. 2009 Mar;33(3):705-6; author reply 706. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00177408.
7
A new perspective on concepts of asthma severity, control and optimum treatment.哮喘严重程度、控制及最佳治疗概念的新视角
Eur Respir J. 2009 Mar;33(3):704-5; author reply 706. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00148608.
8
Physicians' ability to predict patients' adherence to antihypertensive medication in primary care.基层医疗中医生预测患者抗高血压药物依从性的能力。
Hypertens Res. 2008 Sep;31(9):1765-71. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.1765.
9
The Asthma Control and Communication Instrument: a clinical tool developed for ethnically diverse populations.哮喘控制与沟通工具:一种为不同种族人群开发的临床工具。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Nov;122(5):936-943.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.08.027. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
10
Impairment and severity: how ED physicians decide to override an impaired patient's refusal.
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;26(7):803-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.033.

儿童对哮喘控制和严重程度的认知与哮喘状态指标及儿科医生的治疗建议有何关联?

How Do Perceptions of Asthma Control and Severity Relate to Indicators of Asthma Status and Treatment Recommendations by Pediatricians?

作者信息

Demissie Seifu, Riekert Kristin A, Eakin Michelle N, Bilderback Andrew, Diette Gregory B, Okelo Sande O

出版信息

Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2012 Mar;25(1):17-23. doi: 10.1089/ped.2011.0107.

DOI:10.1089/ped.2011.0107
PMID:22454788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3306591/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, asthma control and severity are unique constructs. Little is known about how asthma control and severity are distinguished by pediatricians and if they influence treatment recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a random-sample survey of 500 pediatricians using patient vignettes with different asthma status indicators (recent hospitalization, parental report of bother from asthma, frequent symptoms, parental report of worsening asthma, and wheeze during physical exam) and a visual analog scale (VAS) to rate control and severity. Regression models assessed the independent effects of these indicators on asthma control and severity ratings, and the effects of these ratings on treatment recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 270 respondents provided usable data. Compared to patients with well-controlled asthma: (1) medication intensity influenced only severity ratings; (2) frequent symptoms and recent hospitalization influenced control and severity ratings; (3) wheeze and bother influenced control ratings only (p<0.001 for all comparisons); (4) a report of worse asthma did not significantly affect any ratings (p>0.2). Poorer VAS control ratings were associated with recommendations to step-up treatment (odds ratio [OR] 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-3.1, p<0.001), but more severe VAS ratings were not (OR 1.02, 95% CI, 0.9-1.2, p=0.8). Recommendations to step-down treatment were associated with poorer VAS control ratings (OR 0.70, 95% CI, 0.6-0.8, p<0.001) and more severe VAS ratings (OR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.7-0.9, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians who step-up asthma treatment base their assessments on asthma control, while assessments of both control and severity factor into their decision to step-down asthma therapy.

摘要

背景

根据美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的指南,哮喘控制和严重程度是不同的概念。关于儿科医生如何区分哮喘控制和严重程度,以及它们是否会影响治疗建议,目前知之甚少。

方法

我们对500名儿科医生进行了随机抽样调查,使用具有不同哮喘状态指标(近期住院、家长报告的哮喘困扰、频繁症状、家长报告的哮喘恶化以及体检时的喘息)的患者 vignettes 和视觉模拟量表(VAS)来评估控制和严重程度。回归模型评估了这些指标对哮喘控制和严重程度评分的独立影响,以及这些评分对治疗建议的影响。

结果

共有270名受访者提供了可用数据。与哮喘控制良好的患者相比:(1)用药强度仅影响严重程度评分;(2)频繁症状和近期住院影响控制和严重程度评分;(3)喘息和困扰仅影响控制评分(所有比较 p<0.001);(4)哮喘恶化报告对任何评分均无显著影响(p>0.2)。较差的VAS控制评分与加强治疗的建议相关(优势比[OR] 2.61,95%置信区间[CI],2.2 - 3.1,p<0.001),但更严重的VAS评分则不然(OR 1.02,95% CI,0.9 - 1.2,p = 0.8)。降级治疗的建议与较差的VAS控制评分(OR 0.70,95% CI,0.6 - 0.8,p<0.001)和更严重的VAS评分(OR 0.82,95% CI,0.7 - 0.9,p<0.001)相关。

结论

加强哮喘治疗的儿科医生基于哮喘控制进行评估,而在决定降低哮喘治疗强度时,会同时考虑控制和严重程度因素。