Barnes G R, Collins C J S
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, P. O. Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, U.K.
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Aug;100(2):1135-46. doi: 10.1152/jn.00060.2008. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
During pursuit of moving targets that temporarily disappear, residual smooth eye movements represent the internal (extra-retinal) component of pursuit. However, this response is dependent on expectation of target reappearance. By comparing responses with and without such expectation during early random-onset pursuit, we examined the temporal development of the extra-retinal component and compared it with anticipatory pursuit, another form of internally driven response. In an initial task (mid-ramp extinction), a moving, random-velocity target was initially visible for 100 or 150 ms but then extinguished for 600 ms before reappearing and continuing to move. Responses comprised an initial visually driven rapid rise in eye velocity, followed by a secondary slower increase during extinction. In a second task (short ramp), with identical initial target presentation but no expectation of target reappearance, the initial rapid rise in eye velocity was followed by decay toward zero. The expectation-dependent difference between responses to these tasks increased in velocity during extinction much more slowly than the initial, visually driven component. In a third task (initial extinction), the moving target was extinguished at motion onset but reappeared 600 ms later. Repetition of identical stimuli evoked anticipatory pursuit triggered by initial target offset. Temporal development and scaling of this anticipatory response, which was based on remembered velocity from prior stimuli, was remarkably similar to and covaried with the difference between mid-ramp extinction and short ramp tasks. Results suggest a common mechanism is responsible for anticipatory pursuit and the extra-retinal component of random-onset pursuit, a finding that is consistent with a previously developed model of pursuit.
在追踪暂时消失的移动目标时,残留的平滑眼球运动代表了追踪的内部(视网膜外)成分。然而,这种反应依赖于对目标重新出现的预期。通过比较早期随机起始追踪中有预期和无预期情况下的反应,我们研究了视网膜外成分的时间发展,并将其与预期性追踪(另一种内部驱动反应形式)进行比较。在初始任务(斜坡中期消隐)中,一个以随机速度移动的目标最初可见100或150毫秒,然后消失600毫秒,之后重新出现并继续移动。反应包括最初由视觉驱动的眼球速度快速上升,随后在目标消失期间出现二次较慢的增加。在第二个任务(短斜坡)中,初始目标呈现相同,但没有目标重新出现的预期,眼球速度最初的快速上升之后是向零衰减。对这些任务的反应之间依赖于预期的差异在目标消失期间速度增加得比最初由视觉驱动的成分慢得多。在第三个任务(初始消隐)中,移动目标在运动开始时消失,但600毫秒后重新出现。相同刺激的重复引发了由初始目标偏移触发的预期性追踪。这种基于对先前刺激的记忆速度的预期反应的时间发展和缩放与斜坡中期消隐和短斜坡任务之间的差异非常相似且相关。结果表明,一种共同机制负责预期性追踪和随机起始追踪的视网膜外成分,这一发现与先前开发的追踪模型一致。