• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺侧副韧带重建技术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques.

作者信息

Ruland Robert T, Hogan Christopher J, Randall Craig J, Richards Andrew, Belkoff Stephen M

机构信息

Bone and Joint/Sports Medicine Institute, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1565-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546508319360. Epub 2008 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1177/0363546508319360
PMID:18596198
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incompetence of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow is career-threatening for high-performance throwing athletes. Although multiple reconstructions have been described, a procedure that combines a larger graft with improved fixation may demonstrate more favorable loading characteristics than current techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions utilizing a semitendinosus graft and interference knot fixation will be biomechanically superior to previously reported techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Thirty cadaveric elbows were stripped of all medial soft tissue superficial to the UCL. The proximal humeri were mounted on a materials testing system with the elbows flexed 90 degrees . The intact UCL was loaded to failure at 4.5 deg/s. The torsional failure moment, torsional stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded. Three groups of 10 specimens were created. Group 1 underwent reconstruction using a palmaris tendon graft secured with interference knot fixation. Group 2 reconstructions utilized a palmaris graft and the docking technique. Group 3 specimens were reconstructed using a semitendinosus graft and interference knot fixation. All specimens were loaded to failure and the same parameters recorded.

RESULTS

The torsional failure moments for group 1 (13.28 N x m) and group 2 (12.81 N x m) reconstructions were significantly (P < .05) inferior to that of their respective native values (21.3 N x m and 23.5 N x m). Semitendinosus reconstructions (20.5 N.m) were not significantly different (P = .24) from their native UCLs (23.0 N.m). All reconstructions were torsionally less stiff (P < .001) than the native UCL. There were no statistically significant differences in stiffness between the groups (P = .4).

CONCLUSION

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction utilizing semitendinosus graft and interference knot fixation restores the torsional strength of the intact UCL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Reconstructions using semitendinosus grafts may allow for accelerated rehabilitation and earlier return to competition.

摘要

背景

对于高水平投掷运动员而言,肘部尺侧副韧带(UCL)功能不全可能会对其职业生涯构成威胁。尽管已经描述了多种重建方法,但一种将更大的移植物与改进的固定方式相结合的手术,可能比现有技术具有更有利的负荷特性。

假设

采用半腱肌移植物和干涉结固定的尺侧副韧带重建术在生物力学上优于先前报道的技术。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

将30具尸体肘部的UCL表面所有内侧软组织剥离。将肱骨近端安装在材料测试系统上,肘部屈曲90度。完整的UCL以4.5度/秒的速度加载至失效。记录扭转失效力矩、扭转刚度和失效模式。创建三组,每组10个标本。第1组使用掌长肌腱移植物并通过干涉结固定进行重建。第2组重建使用掌长肌腱移植物和对接技术。第3组标本使用半腱肌移植物和干涉结固定进行重建。所有标本均加载至失效,并记录相同参数。

结果

第1组(13.28N·m)和第2组(12.81N·m)重建的扭转失效力矩明显(P < 0.05)低于其各自的原始值(21.3N·m和23.5N·m)。半腱肌重建(20.5N·m)与其原始UCL(23.0N·m)无显著差异(P = 0.24)。所有重建的扭转刚度均低于原始UCL(P < 0.001)。各组之间的刚度无统计学显著差异(P = 0.4)。

结论

采用半腱肌移植物和干涉结固定的尺侧副韧带重建术可恢复完整UCL的扭转强度。

临床意义

使用半腱肌移植物进行重建可能有助于加速康复并更早重返比赛。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques.尺侧副韧带重建技术的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1565-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546508319360. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
2
Biomechanical analysis of medial collateral ligament reconstruction grafts of the elbow.肘部内侧副韧带重建移植物的生物力学分析
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):728-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546507311094. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
3
Reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint: a cadaver study.拇指掌指关节尺侧副韧带重建:一项尸体研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Mar;30(2):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.09.012.
4
Biomechanical comparison of the docking technique with and without humeral bioabsorbable interference screw fixation.采用与不采用肱骨生物可吸收加压螺钉固定的对接技术的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):526-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546508326986. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
5
Defining safe rehabilitation for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: a biomechanical study.定义肘部尺侧副韧带重建的安全康复:一项生物力学研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):2392-400. doi: 10.1177/0363546509340658. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
6
The GraftLink ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison with the docking technique in both kinematics and failure tests.GraftLink 尺侧副韧带重建:在运动学和失效测试中与对接技术的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2278-87. doi: 10.1177/0363546513498999. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
Biomechanical comparison of graft fixation at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction by the docking technique.采用对接技术进行尺侧副韧带重建时,在肘关节屈曲30°和90°时移植物固定的生物力学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.014.
8
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:采用对接技术与内部支撑修复。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3495-3501. doi: 10.1177/0363546518803771. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
9
Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique.采用双悬吊固定法进行尺侧副韧带重建:与 docking 技术的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1158-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546513481957. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.经皮桡骨茎突入路与传统 Dock 入路尺侧副韧带重建技术的生物力学比较:运动学和失效测试。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1165-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482567.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Allograft Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow a Viable Option for Nonelite Athletes? Outcomes at a Mean of 8 Years.同种异体移植重建肘部尺侧副韧带对非专业运动员来说是可行的选择吗?平均8年的随访结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Oct 16;8(10):2325967120959141. doi: 10.1177/2325967120959141. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique to the Docking Technique.肘部尺侧副韧带内侧重建:一种新型解剖技术与对接技术的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):2325967119857592. doi: 10.1177/2325967119857592. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament chronic isolated insufficiency: anatomical M-UCL reconstruction technique and clinical experience in a mid-term follow-up.
肘关节内侧尺侧副韧带慢性孤立性损伤:解剖学M-UCL重建技术及中期随访临床经验
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Oct;102(Suppl 1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0559-3. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
4
Outcomes following surgical management of complex terrible triad injuries of the elbow: a single surgeon case series.肘关节复杂恐怖三联征损伤手术治疗后的结果:单术者病例系列
Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Jul;10(3):216-222. doi: 10.1177/1758573217713694. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
5
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Repair With Internal Bracing: Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Mechanics.尺侧副韧带重建与带内支撑修复:循环疲劳力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Feb 16;6(2):2325967118755991. doi: 10.1177/2325967118755991. eCollection 2018 Feb.