• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肘部尺侧副韧带内侧重建:一种新型解剖技术与对接技术的生物力学比较

Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique to the Docking Technique.

作者信息

Camp Christopher L, Bernard Christopher, Benavitz Bill, Konicek John, Altchek David W, Dines Joshua S

机构信息

Arthrex Inc, Naples, Florida, USA.

Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):2325967119857592. doi: 10.1177/2325967119857592. eCollection 2019 Jul.

DOI:10.1177/2325967119857592
PMID:31763343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6852368/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, understanding of the anatomy of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) has evolved, demonstrating that the insertional footprint of the UCL on the ulna is more elongated and distally tapered than previously described. Current UCL reconstruction configurations do not typically re-create this native anatomy, which may represent a potential area for improvement.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purposes of this study were (1) to describe a novel anatomic UCL reconstruction technique designed to better replicate the native UCL anatomy and (2) to biomechanically compare this with the docking technique. The hypothesis was that the ultimate load to failure for the anatomic technique would not be inferior to the docking technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (8 matched pairs) were utilized. One elbow in each pair was randomized to receive UCL reconstruction via the docking technique or the novel anatomic UCL reconstruction technique with palmaris tendon autograft. Following reconstruction, biomechanical testing was performed by applying valgus rotational torque at a constant rate of 5 deg/s until ultimate mechanical failure of the construct occurred. Maximal torque (N·m), rotation stiffness (N·m/deg), and mode/location of failure were recorded for each specimen.

RESULTS

The mean ultimate load to failure for elbows in the docking technique group was 23.8 ± 6.1 N·m, as compared with 31.9 ± 8.4 N·m in the anatomic technique group ( = .045). Mean rotational stiffness was 1.9 ± 0.7 versus 2.3 ± 0.9 N·m/deg for the docking and anatomic groups, respectively ( = .338). The most common mode of failure was suture pullout from the graft, which occurred in all 8 (100%) docking technique specimens and 7 of 8 (88%) specimens that underwent the anatomic UCL reconstruction technique.

CONCLUSION

Ultimately, the anatomic UCL reconstruction technique demonstrated superior strength and resistance to valgus torque when compared with the docking technique, and this was comparable with that of the native UCL from prior studies. Increased initial strength may allow for earlier initiation of throwing postoperatively and potentially shorten return-to-play times.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Current UCL reconstruction techniques do not accurately reproduce the UCL insertional anatomy on the ulna. The novel anatomic technique described may result in more natural joint kinematics. This study demonstrated load-to-failure rates that are significantly higher than with the docking technique and consistent with the native ligament, as reported from previous studies. These findings may serve as a foundation for future clinical study and optimization of this technique.

摘要

背景

近年来,对尺侧副韧带(UCL)解剖结构的认识不断发展,表明UCL在尺骨上的附着足迹比先前描述的更长且向远端逐渐变细。目前的UCL重建构型通常无法重现这种天然解剖结构,这可能是一个有待改进的潜在领域。

目的/假设:本研究的目的是(1)描述一种旨在更好地复制天然UCL解剖结构的新型解剖学UCL重建技术,以及(2)对该技术与对接技术进行生物力学比较。假设是解剖学技术的最终破坏载荷不会低于对接技术。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

共使用了16个新鲜冷冻的尸体上肢(8对匹配样本)。每对中的一个肘部随机接受通过对接技术或采用掌长肌腱自体移植的新型解剖学UCL重建技术进行的UCL重建。重建后,以5度/秒的恒定速率施加外翻旋转扭矩进行生物力学测试,直至构建体发生最终机械破坏。记录每个样本的最大扭矩(N·m)、旋转刚度(N·m/度)以及破坏模式/位置。

结果

对接技术组肘部的平均最终破坏载荷为23.8±6.1 N·m,而解剖学技术组为31.9±8.4 N·m(P = 0.045)。对接组和解剖学组的平均旋转刚度分别为1.9±0.7和2.3±0.9 N·m/度(P = 0.338)。最常见的破坏模式是缝线从移植物中拔出,这在所有8个(100%)对接技术样本以及8个接受解剖学UCL重建技术样本中的7个(88%)中发生。

结论

最终,与对接技术相比,解剖学UCL重建技术在抗外翻扭矩方面表现出更强的强度和抵抗力,并且与先前研究中天然UCL的情况相当。增加的初始强度可能允许术后更早开始投掷训练,并可能缩短恢复比赛的时间。

临床意义

目前的UCL重建技术不能准确重现UCL在尺骨上的附着解剖结构。所描述的新型解剖学技术可能会导致更自然的关节运动学。本研究表明,破坏载荷率明显高于对接技术,且与先前研究报道的天然韧带情况一致。这些发现可为该技术未来的临床研究和优化提供基础。

相似文献

1
Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique to the Docking Technique.肘部尺侧副韧带内侧重建:一种新型解剖技术与对接技术的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):2325967119857592. doi: 10.1177/2325967119857592. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.解剖修复尺侧附韧带重建中尺侧足迹与传统尺侧隧道的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;50(5):1375-1381. doi: 10.1177/03635465211054475. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
3
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:采用对接技术与内部支撑修复。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3495-3501. doi: 10.1177/0363546518803771. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.经皮桡骨茎突入路与传统 Dock 入路尺侧副韧带重建技术的生物力学比较:运动学和失效测试。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1165-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482567.
5
Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.修复失败后的桡尺侧副韧带修复术伴缝合增强的桡尺侧副韧带再固定的生物力学评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1477-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation.尺侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较:改良的对接技术与带和不带缝线增强的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):928-932. doi: 10.1177/0363546518820304. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Biomechanical comparison of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with and without an internal brace.尺侧副韧带重建与不带内支撑的生物力学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):2247-2252. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.061. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Biomechanical evaluation of 2 techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow.两种肘关节尺侧副韧带重建技术的生物力学评估
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1599-603. doi: 10.1177/0363546506289340. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
9
Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with single-tunnel proximal suspensory fixation versus modified docking technique.单隧道近端悬吊固定与改良对接技术在尺侧副韧带重建中的生物力学比较
JSES Int. 2022 Dec 23;7(2):364-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.012. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique.采用双悬吊固定法进行尺侧副韧带重建:与 docking 技术的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1158-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546513481957. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating 3D-Printed Guide Plates in Elbow Fixation: A Comparative Study.评估用于肘部固定的3D打印导板:一项对比研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2025 May 5;31:e946660. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946660.
2
Anatomic Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Internal Brace Augmentation in Throwing Athletes.采用内置支撑增强技术对投掷运动员进行解剖学内侧尺侧副韧带重建
Video J Sports Med. 2024 Apr 9;4(2):26350254231212507. doi: 10.1177/26350254231212507. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
3
Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Dual Docking, 4-Ply Reconstructive Technique.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the medial ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow: Review of native ligament anatomy and function.了解肘部内侧尺侧副韧带:对天然韧带解剖结构和功能的综述。
World J Orthop. 2018 Jun 18;9(6):78-84. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i6.78.
2
Outcomes and Return to Sport After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Baseball Players.青少年棒球运动员尺侧副韧带重建后的结果及恢复运动情况
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr 19;6(4):2325967118769328. doi: 10.1177/2325967118769328. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
Epidemiology of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major and Minor League Baseball pitchers: comprehensive report of 1429 cases.
内侧尺侧副韧带重建:一种双对接四股重建技术。
Video J Sports Med. 2022 Mar 10;2(2):26350254211060353. doi: 10.1177/26350254211060353. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
4
Twisting technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: new possibilities toward enhancing the strength of autografts.用于肘部尺侧副韧带重建的扭转技术:增强自体移植物强度的新可能性。
JSES Int. 2024 Jan 17;8(3):614-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.12.003. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Biomechanical Comparison of Stability and Strength After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Bone Tunnels.尺侧副韧带重建中使用缝线锚钉固定与骨隧道固定后的稳定性和强度的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Sep 8;11(9):23259671231196135. doi: 10.1177/23259671231196135. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) Reconstruction With Proximal Single-Tunnel Suspensory Fixation.采用近端单隧道悬吊固定法重建尺侧副韧带
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 May 29;12(6):e997-e1002. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.02.038. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with single-tunnel proximal suspensory fixation versus modified docking technique.单隧道近端悬吊固定与改良对接技术在尺侧副韧带重建中的生物力学比较
JSES Int. 2022 Dec 23;7(2):364-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.012. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
The 50 most impactful articles on the medial ulnar collateral ligament: An altmetric analysis of online media.关于内侧尺侧副韧带的50篇最具影响力的文章:在线媒体的替代计量分析
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Nov 24;10:20503121221129921. doi: 10.1177/20503121221129921. eCollection 2022.
9
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Modified Jobe Technique in Baseball Pitchers.棒球投手改良Jobe技术的尺侧副韧带重建术
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 27;9(4):2325967121998339. doi: 10.1177/2325967121998339. eCollection 2021 Apr.
10
The Effect of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation on Articular Contact Mechanics: A Cadaveric Study.带内支撑增强的尺侧副韧带修复对关节接触力学的影响:一项尸体研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 23;9(4):23259671211001069. doi: 10.1177/23259671211001069. eCollection 2021 Apr.
大联盟和小联盟棒球投手中尺侧副韧带重建的流行病学:1429 例综合报告。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 May;27(5):871-878. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.024.
4
Return to Play After Multiligament Knee Injuries in National Football League Athletes.重返赛场:美国国家橄榄球联盟运动员多发韧带膝关节损伤后的康复
Sports Health. 2018 Nov/Dec;10(6):495-499. doi: 10.1177/1941738118768812. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Osseous Vascularity of the Medial Elbow After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Docking and Modified Jobe Techniques.尺侧副韧带重建术后内侧肘部的骨血管情况:对接技术与改良乔布技术的比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr 2;6(4):2325967118763153. doi: 10.1177/2325967118763153. eCollection 2018 Apr.
6
Quantitative Anatomic Analysis of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Complex of the Elbow.肘部尺侧副韧带复合体的定量解剖分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 26;6(3):2325967118762751. doi: 10.1177/2325967118762751. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Summative Report on Time Out of Play for Major and Minor League Baseball: An Analysis of 49,955 Injuries From 2011 Through 2016.2011 年至 2016 年大联盟和小联盟棒球比赛中断时间的总结报告:对 49955 例伤病的分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;46(7):1727-1732. doi: 10.1177/0363546518765158. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
8
Comparison of Bone Tunnel and Cortical Surface Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rabbit Model of Biceps Tenodesis.兔肱二头肌肌腱固定模型中骨隧道与皮质表面肌腱-骨愈合的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Mar 21;100(6):479-486. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00797.
9
Length of time between surgery and return to sport after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers does not predict need for revision surgery.美国职业棒球大联盟投手尺侧副韧带重建术后恢复运动的时间长短并不能预测翻修手术的必要性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.014.
10
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis.一项比较干扰螺钉和缝合锚技术用于肱二头肌肌腱固定术的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):440-448. doi: 10.1177/0363546516667577. Epub 2016 Oct 22.