Suppr超能文献

尺侧副韧带重建与带内支撑修复:循环疲劳力学比较

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Repair With Internal Bracing: Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Mechanics.

作者信息

Jones Christopher M, Beason David P, Dugas Jeffrey R

机构信息

American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Feb 16;6(2):2325967118755991. doi: 10.1177/2325967118755991. eCollection 2018 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries have increased significantly in recent years, and reconstruction has become the preferred treatment for UCL injury over ligament repair. In a recent study, UCL repair with internal bracing demonstrated significantly greater resistance to gap formation in biomechanical tests, even at low cycles of valgus loading.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the fatigue and failure mechanics of traditional UCL reconstruction with UCL repair and internal bracing. We hypothesized that repaired specimens would have less gap formation, closer return to native gap formation, and greater maximum torque to failure versus traditionally reconstructed specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten matched pairs of cadaveric elbows were positioned at 90° of flexion and the native UCL subjected to 500 cycles of subfailure valgus loading. A simulated tear was created, and the 10 cycles were repeated. Each pair of specimens was next given repair with internal bracing on 1 side and a modified Jobe reconstruction on the contralateral side, followed by 100 manual cycles of flexion-extension, 500 cycles of valgus rotation, and, finally, rotation to failure.

RESULTS

The specimens that received the repair unexpectedly experienced significantly less gapping in the torn state than did those in the reconstruction group. At the 10th cycle, repaired UCL injuries had significantly less gap formation than the reconstructed UCLs. At the 100th and 500th cycles, repaired UCL injuries continued to experience significantly less gap formation as compared with the reconstructed injuries.

CONCLUSION

When compared with the gold standard reconstruction technique, UCL repair with internal bracing is more resistant to gap formation under fatigue loading. However, the unexpected early difference between the torn states may have confounded this finding. Time-zero failure properties of this repair technique are on par with those of traditional reconstruction, even after 500 cycles of valgus loading.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

UCL reconstruction has become a common procedure among adolescent and elite-level throwers. Recent data suggest that UCL repair may be a viable option for younger athletes with acute proximal or distal UCL tears, allowing a faster return to play.

摘要

背景

近年来,尺侧副韧带(UCL)损伤显著增加,与韧带修复相比,重建已成为UCL损伤的首选治疗方法。在最近的一项研究中,采用内部支撑的UCL修复在生物力学测试中显示出对间隙形成的抵抗力显著更强,即使在低周期外翻负荷下也是如此。

目的/假设:本研究的目的是比较传统UCL重建与UCL修复及内部支撑的疲劳和失效力学。我们假设,与传统重建的标本相比,修复后的标本间隙形成更少,更接近原始间隙形成,并且失效时的最大扭矩更大。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

将十对匹配的尸体肘部置于90°屈曲位,对天然UCL施加500次亚失效外翻负荷循环。制造一个模拟撕裂,然后重复10个循环。接下来,每对标本的一侧进行内部支撑修复,对侧进行改良的乔布重建,随后进行100次屈伸手动循环、500次外翻旋转循环,最后旋转至失效。

结果

接受修复的标本在撕裂状态下意外地比重建组的标本间隙明显更小。在第10个循环时,修复的UCL损伤的间隙形成明显少于重建的UCL。在第100个和第500个循环时,与重建损伤相比,修复的UCL损伤的间隙形成仍然明显更少。

结论

与金标准重建技术相比,采用内部支撑的UCL修复在疲劳负荷下对间隙形成的抵抗力更强。然而,撕裂状态下意外的早期差异可能混淆了这一发现。即使经过500次外翻负荷循环,这种修复技术的零时间失效特性与传统重建相当。

临床意义

UCL重建已成为青少年和精英级投掷运动员中的常见手术。最近的数据表明,对于急性近端或远端UCL撕裂的年轻运动员,UCL修复可能是一种可行的选择,能使其更快重返赛场。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d8b/5818096/001195b92945/10.1177_2325967118755991-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验