Suppr超能文献

难治性癫痫开颅手术失败后的迷走神经刺激疗法:来自迷走神经刺激疗法患者结局登记处的结果

Vagus nerve stimulation therapy after failed cranial surgery for intractable epilepsy: results from the vagus nerve stimulation therapy patient outcome registry.

作者信息

Amar Arun Paul, Apuzzo Michael L J, Liu Charles Y

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62 Suppl 2:506-13. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000316253.54651.5e.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy among patients with persistent or recurrent seizures after lobar resection, callosotomy, and other cranial operations for intractable epilepsy.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the VNS therapy patient outcome registry, which was established after United States Food and Drug Administration approval of the VNS device in 1997 as a means of capturing open-label clinical data outside of protocol. The integrity of the systems for collecting and processing registry data was authenticated by an independent auditing agency. The effect of potential selection bias, however, remains uncertain.

RESULTS

Two nonconsecutive cohorts were compared: patients tracked in the registry who had previously undergone cranial surgery for epilepsy (CS group, n=921) and those who had not (non-CS group, n = 3822). For the CS group, the median reduction in seizure frequency was 42.5% after 3 months of VNS therapy, 42.9% at 6 months, 45.7% at 12 months, 52.0% at 18 months, and 50.5% at 24 months. For the non-CS group, analogous rates were 47.0%, 52.9%, 60.0%, 62.7%, and 66.7%, respectively. In the CS group, seizures were reduced by at least 50% in 55.1% of patients, at least 75% in 31.4% of patients, at least 90% in 17.3% of patients, and 100% in 5.1% of patients after 24 months of VNS therapy. Response rates were more pronounced in the non-CS group: at least 50% in 62.2% of patients, at least 75% in 43.7% of patients, at least 90% in 26.8% of patients, and 100% in 8.3% of patients. Patients in both groups experienced marked improvements in quality of life parameters.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of VNS is maintained during prolonged stimulation, and overall seizure control continues to improve with time. Patients in whom prior cranial surgery had failed did not respond as favorably as all other patients receiving VNS therapy. Nonetheless, many of the former group improved substantially. Thus, on the basis of these open-label data, VNS therapy represents a potentially palliative treatment option for patients with refractory seizures after failed cranial surgery.

摘要

目的

确定迷走神经刺激(VNS)疗法对因叶切除、胼胝体切开术及其他针对难治性癫痫的开颅手术后仍有持续性或复发性癫痫发作的患者的疗效。

方法

数据取自VNS疗法患者结局登记处,该登记处是在1997年美国食品药品监督管理局批准VNS设备后设立的,作为一种收集方案外开放标签临床数据的手段。收集和处理登记数据的系统完整性由一家独立审计机构进行了验证。然而,潜在选择偏倚的影响仍不确定。

结果

比较了两个非连续队列:登记处追踪的曾接受癫痫开颅手术的患者(CS组,n = 921)和未接受过此类手术的患者(非CS组,n = 3822)。对于CS组,VNS治疗3个月后癫痫发作频率的中位数降低了42.5%,6个月时为42.9%,12个月时为45.7%,18个月时为52.0%,24个月时为50.5%。对于非CS组,相应的比例分别为47.0%、52.9%、60.0%、62.7%和66.7%。在CS组中,VNS治疗24个月后,55.1%的患者癫痫发作减少了至少50%,31.4%的患者减少了至少75%,17.3%的患者减少了至少90%,5.1%的患者癫痫发作完全消失。非CS组的缓解率更为显著:62.2%的患者癫痫发作减少了至少50%,43.7%的患者减少了至少75%,26.8%的患者减少了至少90%,8.3%的患者癫痫发作完全消失。两组患者的生活质量参数均有显著改善。

结论

VNS在长期刺激过程中疗效得以维持,总体癫痫控制随时间持续改善。先前开颅手术失败的患者对VNS疗法的反应不如所有其他接受VNS治疗的患者,但前一组中的许多患者仍有显著改善。因此,基于这些开放标签数据,VNS疗法对于开颅手术失败后难治性癫痫发作的患者而言是一种潜在的姑息治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验