Hoit Daniel A, Schirmer Clemens M, Malek Adel M
Department of Neurosurgery, Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Division, Tufts-New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5 Suppl 2):ONS380-8; discussion ONS388-9. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000326022.08973.b2.
Endovascular stent graft (SG) deployment offers a useful vessel-preserving strategy for vascular wall lesions such as pseudoaneurysms and fistulae. Although deployment of expanded polytetrafluoro-ethylene-covered SGs within the carotid and vertebral arteries is technically feasible, data on long-term efficacy, safety, and patency rate remain sparse.
Six patients with traumatic (n = 4), iatrogenic (n = 1), or spontaneous (n = 1) internal carotid and vertebral artery injuries (direct carotid-cavernous fistula, n = 2; pseudoaneurysms, n = 4) were treated with nine balloon-mounted coronary expanded polytetrafluoro-ethylene SGs. Angiographic (mean, 2.3 yr; range, 1.7-4.2 yr) and neurological follow-up (mean, 2.7 yr) was performed for all patients.
Complete angiographic exclusion of the lesion was achieved by the initial procedure in five of the six patients; one ruptured cavernous carotid aneurysm leading to a direct carotid-cavernous fistula showed persistent slow shunting despite tandem deployment of two SGs. All six patients revealed complete and persistent angiographic obliteration at delayed follow-up, with minimal in-stent stenosis (<20%) seen in two instances. Difficulty with SG navigation was encountered in five patients, resulting in one instance of guide catheter-induced intimal dissection. Type I endoleak was observed in five patients, requiring secondary angioplasty in four patients and deployment of an additional tandem SG in three.
Technical challenges in current-generation SG deployment include sizing, navigation, positioning, and propensity for endoleak. When managed successfully, stent grafting provides a valuable approach for the treatment of vascular wall defects for which vessel preservation is preferred. Intermediate-term safety is satisfactory, with no delayed complications and minimal in-stent stenosis in follow-up periods of more than 2 years.
血管内支架移植物(SG)置入术为诸如假性动脉瘤和瘘管等血管壁病变提供了一种有用的血管保留策略。尽管在颈动脉和椎动脉内植入膨体聚四氟乙烯覆盖的SG在技术上是可行的,但关于长期疗效、安全性和通畅率的数据仍然稀少。
6例患有创伤性(n = 4)、医源性(n = 1)或自发性(n = 1)颈内动脉和椎动脉损伤的患者(直接颈内动脉海绵窦瘘,n = 2;假性动脉瘤,n = 4)接受了9个球囊扩张式冠状动脉膨体聚四氟乙烯SG治疗。对所有患者进行了血管造影随访(平均2.3年;范围1.7 - 4.2年)和神经学随访(平均2.7年)。
6例患者中有5例通过初始手术实现了病变的完全血管造影排除;1例破裂的海绵窦颈动脉瘤导致直接颈内动脉海绵窦瘘,尽管串联植入了2个SG,但仍显示持续缓慢分流。所有6例患者在延迟随访时均显示血管造影完全且持续闭塞,2例出现最小的支架内狭窄(<20%)。5例患者在SG置入过程中遇到困难,导致1例导引导管引起的内膜夹层。5例患者观察到I型内漏,4例患者需要二次血管成形术,3例患者需要额外串联植入SG。
当前一代SG置入术的技术挑战包括尺寸选择、置入、定位和内漏倾向。成功处理后,支架植入术为治疗首选保留血管的血管壁缺损提供了一种有价值的方法。中期安全性令人满意,在超过2年的随访期内无延迟并发症且支架内狭窄最小。