Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
J Clin Neurol. 2013 Apr;9(2):83-90. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2013.9.2.83. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
This study evaluated the clinical value of detachable-balloon embolization for traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula (TCCF), focusing on the frequency, risk factors, and retreatment of recurrence.
Fifty-eight patients with TCCF underwent transarterial detachable-balloon embolization between October 2004 and March 2011. The clinical follow-up was performed every 3 months until up to 3 years postprocedure. Each patient was placed in either the recurrence group or the nonrecurrence group according to whether a recurrence developed after the first procedure. The relevant factors including gender, fistula location, interval between trauma and the interventional procedure, blood flow in the carotid-cavernous fistula, number of balloons, and whether the internal carotid artery (ICA) was sacrificed were evaluated.
All 58 TCCFs were successfully treated with transarterial balloon embolization, including 7 patients with ICA sacrifice. Recurrent fistulas occurred in seven patients during the follow-up period. Univariate analysis indicated that the interval between trauma and the interventional procedure (p=0.006) might be the main factor related to the recurrence of TCCF. The second treatments involved ICA sacrifice in two patients, fistula embolization with balloons in four patients, and placement of a covered stent in one patient.
Detachable balloons can still serve as the first-line treatment for TCCFs and recurrent TCCFs despite having a nonnegligible recurrence rate. Shortening the interval between trauma and the interventional procedure may reduce the risk of recurrence.
本研究评估了可分离球囊栓塞治疗创伤性颈动脉海绵窦瘘(TCCF)的临床价值,重点关注复发的频率、风险因素和再治疗。
2004 年 10 月至 2011 年 3 月期间,58 例 TCCF 患者接受了经动脉可分离球囊栓塞治疗。临床随访每 3 个月进行一次,直到术后 3 年。根据首次治疗后是否出现复发,将每位患者分为复发组或未复发组。评估的相关因素包括性别、瘘管位置、创伤与介入治疗的时间间隔、颈动脉海绵窦瘘的血流、球囊数量以及颈内动脉(ICA)是否被牺牲。
58 例 TCCF 均经经动脉球囊栓塞成功治疗,其中 7 例患者 ICA 被牺牲。在随访期间,7 例患者出现复发性瘘管。单因素分析表明,创伤与介入治疗的时间间隔(p=0.006)可能是 TCCF 复发的主要相关因素。第二次治疗涉及 2 例患者 ICA 牺牲、4 例患者球囊瘘管栓塞和 1 例患者放置覆膜支架。
尽管复发率不可忽视,但可分离球囊仍然可以作为 TCCF 和复发性 TCCF 的一线治疗方法。缩短创伤与介入治疗的时间间隔可能会降低复发的风险。