Verhovsek Madeleine, Motlagh Bahareh, Crowther Mark A, Kennedy Courtney, Dolovich Lisa, Campbell Glenda, Wang Luqi, Papaioannou Alexandra
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Geriatr. 2008 Jul 3;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-13.
Maintenance of therapeutic International Normalized Ratio (INR) in the community is generally poor. The supervised environment in long-term care facilities may represent a more ideal setting for warfarin therapy since laboratory monitoring, compliance, dose adjustment, and interacting medications can all be monitored and controlled. The objectives of this study were to determine how effectively warfarin was administered to a cohort of residents in long-term care facilities, to identify the proportion of residents prescribed warfarin-interacting drugs and to ascertain factors associated with poor INR control.
A chart review of 105 residents receiving warfarin therapy in five long-term care facilities in Hamilton, Ontario was performed. Data were collected on INR levels, warfarin prescribing and monitoring practices, and use of interacting medications.
Over a 12 month period (28,555 resident-days, 78.2 resident years) 3065 INR values were available. Residents were within, below and above the therapeutic range 54%, 35% and 11% of the time, respectively. Seventy-nine percent of residents were prescribed at least one warfarin-interacting medication during the period in review. Residents receiving interacting medications spent less time in the therapeutic range (53.0% vs. 58.2%, OR = 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.97, P = 0.002). Adequacy of anticoagulation varied significantly between physicians (time in therapeutic range 45.9 to 63.9%).
In this group of long-term care residents, warfarin control was suboptimal. Both prescriber and co-prescription of interacting medications were associated with poorer INR control. Future studies should seek strategies to improve prescriber skill and decrease use of interacting medications.
社区中治疗性国际标准化比值(INR)的维持情况普遍较差。长期护理机构中的监督环境可能是华法林治疗更理想的场所,因为实验室监测、依从性、剂量调整和相互作用药物都可得到监测和控制。本研究的目的是确定华法林在长期护理机构的一组居民中给药的有效性,确定开具华法林相互作用药物的居民比例,并确定与INR控制不佳相关的因素。
对安大略省汉密尔顿市五家长期护理机构中接受华法林治疗的105名居民进行病历审查。收集了INR水平、华法林处方和监测实践以及相互作用药物使用的数据。
在12个月期间(28555居民日,78.2居民年),可获得3065个INR值。居民处于治疗范围内、低于治疗范围和高于治疗范围的时间分别为54%、35%和11%。在审查期间,79%的居民至少开具了一种华法林相互作用药物。接受相互作用药物的居民处于治疗范围内的时间较少(53.0%对58.2%,OR = 0.93,95%置信区间0.88至0.97,P = 0.002)。不同医生之间抗凝的充分性差异显著(处于治疗范围内的时间为45.9%至63.9%)。
在这组长期护理居民中,华法林控制不理想。开处方者和相互作用药物的联合处方都与较差的INR控制相关。未来的研究应寻求提高开处方者技能和减少相互作用药物使用的策略。