Suppr超能文献

退伍军人事务部养老院中华法林处方和监测的质量。

The quality of warfarin prescribing and monitoring in Veterans Affairs nursing homes.

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Center for Medication Safety, Hines, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Aug;58(8):1475-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02967.x. Epub 2010 Jul 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the quality of warfarin prescribing and monitoring in Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes and to assess the factors associated with maintaining a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Five VA nursing homes.

PARTICIPANTS

All veterans who received warfarin between January 1 and June 30, 2008, at the nursing homes.

MEASUREMENTS

Using medical records, the percentage of person-time spent in the target INR range, the proportion of patients with INRs in the therapeutic range on 50% or more of their person-days, and the frequency of INR monitoring were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with maintaining a therapeutic INR 50% or more of the time.

RESULTS

Over 6 months, 160 patients received 10,380 person-days of warfarin. INRs were in the therapeutic range for 55% of the person-days, and 99% of the INR tests were repeated within 4 weeks of the previous result. On an individual level, 49% of patients had INRs in the target range for 50% or more of their person-days. Achieving this outcome was more likely in patients with prevalent warfarin use than with new use (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.06-7.72). Conversely, patients with a history of a stroke (AOR=0.38, 95% CI =0.18-0.80) were less likely to have therapeutic INRs for 50% or more of their days.

CONCLUSION

Warfarin appears to be prescribed and monitored effectively in VA nursing home patients. Future studies should focus on increasing time in therapeutic range in patients with poor INR control.

摘要

目的

描述退伍军人事务部(VA)疗养院中华法林的开具和监测质量,并评估与维持治疗性国际标准化比值(INR)相关的因素。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

VA 疗养院内的 5 家疗养院。

参与者

疗养院内于 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间接受华法林治疗的所有退伍军人。

测量方法

使用病历记录,估计目标 INR 范围内的个人时间百分比、INR 在治疗范围内的患者比例(占其个人天数的 50%或以上)以及 INR 监测的频率。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定与维持治疗性 INR 50%或以上时间相关的因素。

结果

在 6 个月期间,有 160 名患者接受了 10380 人天的华法林治疗。INR 处于治疗范围内的时间占个人天数的 55%,并且 99%的 INR 检测是在上一次结果的 4 周内重复进行的。在个人层面上,49%的患者 INR 在治疗范围内的时间占其个人天数的 50%或以上。与新使用者相比,有华法林既往使用史的患者更有可能达到这一结果(调整后的优势比(AOR)=2.86,95%置信区间(CI)=1.06-7.72)。相反,有中风史的患者(AOR=0.38,95%CI=0.18-0.80)INR 达到治疗范围的时间比例更低。

结论

VA 疗养院的华法林使用和监测似乎是有效的。未来的研究应重点提高 INR 控制不佳的患者的治疗范围时间。

相似文献

1
The quality of warfarin prescribing and monitoring in Veterans Affairs nursing homes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Aug;58(8):1475-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02967.x. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
2
Randomized trial of a warfarin communication protocol for nursing homes: an SBAR-based approach.
Am J Med. 2011 Feb;124(2):179.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.09.017.
4
Prospective study of the outcomes of ambulatory patients with excessive warfarin anticoagulation.
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 12;160(11):1612-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1612.
5
Outcomes associated with warfarin time in therapeutic range among US veterans with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Mar;34(3):415-421. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1384370. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Meta-analysis to assess the quality of warfarin control in atrial fibrillation patients in the United States.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Apr;15(3):244-52. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.3.244.
8
Warfarin-antibiotic interactions in older adults of an outpatient anticoagulation clinic.
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;10(6):352-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Dementia and risk of adverse warfarin-related events in the nursing home setting.
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Oct;10(5):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.09.003.
10
Evaluating warfarin management by pharmacists in a community teaching hospital.
Consult Pharm. 2014 Feb;29(2):95-103. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.95.

引用本文的文献

3
Magnitudes of Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism and Quality of Anticoagulant Therapy in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Apr 11;18:245-252. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S347667. eCollection 2022.
9
Use of warfarin in long-term care: a systematic review.
BMC Geriatr. 2012 Apr 5;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-14.

本文引用的文献

2
Warfarin treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation: observing outcomes associated with varying levels of INR control.
Thromb Res. 2009 May;124(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.09.016. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
3
Warfarin dose management affects INR control.
J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jan;7(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03199.x. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
4
Discrepancies in identification of major bleeding events in patients taking warfarin.
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Sep;28(9):1098-103. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.9.1098.
10
The safety of warfarin therapy in the nursing home setting.
Am J Med. 2007 Jun;120(6):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.07.045. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验