• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高b值扩散加权成像在前列腺正常及恶性外周带组织中的应用:信噪比的影响

High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: effect of signal-to-noise ratio.

作者信息

Kitajima Kazuhiro, Kaji Yasushi, Kuroda Kagayaki, Sugimura Kazuro

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(2):93-9. doi: 10.2463/mrms.7.93.

DOI:10.2463/mrms.7.93
PMID:18603841
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using a high b-value (2,000 s/mm2) is superior to that using a standard b-value (1,000 s/mm2) for discriminating malignant from normal peripheral tissue in the prostate.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent 1.5T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging including single-shot, echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with repetition time/echo time, 3500/88 ms; 4-mm slice thickness; 1-mm interslice gap; 144x128 matrix; field of view, 250x250 mm; number of excitations, 10; and b-values, 0, 1,000, and 2,000 s/mm2. For each patient, ADC values were obtained for malignant and normal tissue using b=1,000 and 2,000 in a monoexponential model. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios in DWI were also evaluated.

RESULTS

At b=1,000, the mean ADC (x10(-3) mm2/s) for malignant tissue was 0.82+/-0.27 (range 0.43-1.29) and for normal tissue, 1.69+/-0.23 (1.31-2.18). At b=2000, the mean ADC for malignant tissue was 0.61+/-0.19 (0.30-0.94) and for normal tissue, 1.01+/-0.14 (0.73-1.35). Significant ADC overlap between the malignant and normal tissue was recognized at b=2000. As b-value increased, the mean SNR within malignant tissue decreased by 21.6%, and mean CNR decreased 17.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the same imaging conditions, measuring ADC using a high b-value (2,000 s/mm2) in a monoexponential model has little diagnostic advantage over using the standard b-value (1,000 s/mm2) in discriminating malignant from normal prostate tissue.

摘要

目的

确定在鉴别前列腺恶性外周组织与正常外周组织时,使用高b值(2000 s/mm²)获得的表观扩散系数(ADC)是否优于使用标准b值(1000 s/mm²)获得的表观扩散系数。

方法

26例经活检证实为前列腺癌的患者接受了1.5T磁共振(MR)成像,包括单次激发回波平面扩散加权成像(DWI),重复时间/回波时间为3500/88 ms;层厚4 mm;层间距1 mm;矩阵144×128;视野250×250 mm;激励次数10次;b值为0、1000和2000 s/mm²。对于每位患者,在单指数模型中使用b = 1000和2000分别获取恶性组织和正常组织的ADC值。还评估了DWI中的信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。

结果

在b = 1000时,恶性组织的平均ADC(×10⁻³ mm²/s)为0.82±0.27(范围0.43 - 1.29),正常组织为1.69±0.23(1.31 - 2.18)。在b = 2000时,恶性组织的平均ADC为0.61±0.19(0.30 - 0.94),正常组织为1.01±0.14(0.73 - 1.35)。在b = 2000时,恶性组织与正常组织之间存在明显的ADC重叠。随着b值增加,恶性组织内的平均SNR下降21.6%,平均CNR下降17.3%。

结论

在相同成像条件下,在单指数模型中使用高b值(2000 s/mm²)测量ADC在鉴别前列腺恶性组织与正常组织方面,相比使用标准b值(1000 s/mm²)几乎没有诊断优势。

相似文献

1
High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: effect of signal-to-noise ratio.高b值扩散加权成像在前列腺正常及恶性外周带组织中的应用:信噪比的影响
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(2):93-9. doi: 10.2463/mrms.7.93.
2
Stimulated-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with moderate b values for the detection of prostate cancer.应用中等 b 值的激发回波弥散加权成像检测前列腺癌。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3236-3244. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06689-w. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
3
In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissue using thin-slice echo-planar imaging.使用薄层回波平面成像对正常和恶性前列腺组织中的表观扩散系数进行体内测量。
Radiol Med. 2006 Dec;111(8):1124-33. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0110-8. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
4
High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2.3T 下高 b 值扩散加权成像检测前列腺癌:b 值分别为 1000 和 2000 s/mm2 的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):W33-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3004.
5
Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.用于前列腺癌成像的表观扩散系数:B 值的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):W247-53. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10917.
6
Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region.表观扩散系数:根据解剖区域比较前列腺癌组织与非癌组织
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Nov;28(5):1173-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21513.
7
Optimization of b value in diffusion-weighted MRI for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral fractures.扩散加权磁共振成像中b值优化用于鉴别诊断良性与恶性椎体骨折
Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Nov;36(11):1035-41. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0358-7. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
8
Quantitative evaluation of computed high B value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.前列腺计算机高B值扩散加权磁共振成像的定量评估
Invest Radiol. 2013 Nov;48(11):779-86. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31829705bb.
9
Comparison of stretched-Exponential and monoexponential model diffusion-Weighted imaging in prostate cancer and normal tissues.拉伸指数模型与单指数模型在前列腺癌及正常组织弥散加权成像中的对比。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Oct;42(4):1078-85. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24872. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
10
Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.应用单指数和双指数扩散加权成像鉴别中央腺体前列腺癌与前列腺增生。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Oct;31(8):1318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Denoising complex-valued diffusion MR images using a two-step, nonlocal principal component analysis approach.使用两步非局部主成分分析方法去噪复值扩散磁共振图像。
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Jun;93(6):2473-2487. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30502. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Denoising complex-valued diffusion MR images using a two-step non-local principal component analysis approach.使用两步非局部主成分分析方法去噪复值扩散磁共振图像。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 31:2024.10.30.621081. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.30.621081.
3
Deep learning image reconstruction of diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of prostate cancer focusing on its clinical implications.
聚焦临床应用的深度学习图像重建在前列腺癌弥散加权成像评估中的应用
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 May 1;14(5):3432-3446. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1379. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
Diffusion kurtosis imaging and standard diffusion imaging in the magnetic resonance imaging assessment of prostate cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在前列腺癌磁共振成像评估中的应用
Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1806-1822. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-53. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Diagnostic value of synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging on breast magnetic resonance imaging assessment: comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging.合成扩散加权成像在乳腺磁共振成像评估中的诊断价值:与常规扩散加权成像的比较。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 Mar 6;30(2):91-98. doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.232466. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
6
Acquisition Parameters Influence Diffusion Metrics Effectiveness in Probing Prostate Tumor and Age-Related Microstructure.采集参数对扩散指标探测前列腺肿瘤及与年龄相关微观结构的有效性有影响。
J Pers Med. 2023 May 20;13(5):860. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050860.
7
Directional and inter-acquisition variability in diffusion-weighted imaging and editing for restricted diffusion.扩散加权成像及受限扩散编辑中的方向和采集间可变性。
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Nov;88(5):2298-2310. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29385. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
8
Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.弥散加权乳腺磁共振成像的质量和诊断价值:采集图像与计算图像的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 22;16(2):e0247379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247379. eCollection 2021.
9
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Noninvasive Parameter for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Intraperitoneal Collections.扩散加权磁共振成像作为一种无创参数,用于区分良性和恶性腹腔积液。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 May 1;56(5):217. doi: 10.3390/medicina56050217.
10
Synthetic Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for High -Value Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Prostate.前列腺高值扩散加权磁共振成像的合成表观扩散系数
Prostate Cancer. 2020 Feb 10;2020:5091218. doi: 10.1155/2020/5091218. eCollection 2020.