The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section.

INTRODUCTION

Caesarean delivery remains the most common intraperitoneal surgical procedure in obstetric and gynaecologic practice. Since time immemorial there have been countless efforts to improve the technique of caesarean section. One such innovative breakthrough technique is the Misgav Ladach method of caesarean of section. The objective of this trial was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between the conventional and the Misgav-Ladach technique for caesarean section.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The randomized prospective comparative study was carried out in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, B.P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan Nepal. Four hundred patients were randomized to either Misgav Ladach or the Conventional method of caesarean section. Only term pregnancies with singleton foetuses' were included whereas pregnancies with previous caesarean section were excluded from the study. The study period was from September 2001 to September 2004.

RESULT

There was not much difference in the demographic variables between the two groups. The age of the patients ranged between 18-40 years. The mean age of patients in Misgav Ladach and conventional group was 24.5 and 23.6 years respectively. Foetal distress was the commonest indication for caesarean section followed by non progress of labour. The mean incision to delivery interval, operating time and blood loss in the Misgav Ladach group was 1 minute 30 seconds, 16 minutes and 35 0ml as compared to 3 minutes, 28 minutes and 600 ml in the conventional group respectively. 3.5%of patients in the Misgav Ladach group showed febrile morbidity as compared to 7% in the conventional group. 19% from conventional group and only 4%from Misgav Ladach group required added analgesia. Almost equal number of patients (10-12) in each group experienced significant headache.).0.1%in the Misgav group and 5% in the Conventional group required post operative blood transfusion. Four patients from the conventional group had their wound gaped. The number of neonates requiring intensive care was sixteen (8% ) in the conventional group and 3 (1.5%) in the Misgav group.6.5% from conventional group and 2% from Misgav Ladach group required maternal intensive care admissions.

CONCLUSION

Misgav-Ladach technique has been be associated with shorter operative time, quicker recovery, and lesser need for postoperative medications, when compared with traditional caesarean section. It has also been shown to be more cost-effective. A further advantage of the technique may be the shorter time taken for the delivery of the child.