Nautiyal Sunil, Kaechele Harald
Institute of Socioeconomics, ZALF, Eberswalder Str. 84, Muencheberg, Brandenburg 15374, Germany.
Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Jun;153(1-4):253-71. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0353-z. Epub 2008 Jul 5.
The concept of ecosystem conservation as a broad theme came into existence during the 1970s under the Man and Biosphere Programme (MAB) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The Indian Government followed this approach and chose the method to segregate the landscape for conservation of the ecosystem as well as for the development of the local economy and its people. We have examined the effect of this policy and concurrently developed a theoretical modeling approach to understand how human behavior is changing under shifting political, socioeconomic and environmental conditions. A specific focus has been on how the landscape is changing in the mountains of the Indian Himalayan region where about 10% of the total geographical area is converted into protected landscape for conservation of biodiversity. For local people living in the Himalayan mountains in India, agriculture is the main land use activity and is strongly linked to the forests in providing sustainability. There are several branches in the rural ecosystems where the local people's economy was centered. These include agriculture, animal husbandry, medicinal and aromatic plants cultivation, forest resource collection, tourism and other occupations. The greatest proportion of the population was engaged in the agriculture sector, whose contribution is high in the rural economy (61%); followed by animal husbandry (19%), forest resource collection for economic gain (18%), and medicinal and aromatic plants cultivation (1.5%). However, three decades ago the animal husbandry branch of the rural ecosystem was contributing the maximum share towards rural household income (40%) followed by tourism (35.2%), and lastly agriculture (14%). The desire of farmers to secure the optimum output from agricultural land use has resulted in an increase for resource collection from the forests. The people's perception (n = 1,648) regarding overall changes occurring in the region was varied and most showed that the current trend within rural ecosystems has emerged because of the implementation of conservation policies/creation of national park and biosphere reserve (80%), followed by limitation (22%), climate (20%), population growth (7%), national economy (10%) and least by socioeconomic change (5%). The theoretical agent model developed here draws attention to agent/farmer behavior and land resource use for his livelihood in the temporal dimension. The current study would be helpful to introduce new approaches for the development of the methodological and theoretical aspects associated with the complex human and ecosystem interactions in the Himalayan mountains for sustainable landscape development.
作为一个广泛主题的生态系统保护概念,是在20世纪70年代联合国教育、科学及文化组织(教科文组织)的人与生物圈计划(MAB)下形成的。印度政府遵循了这种方法,并选择了划分景观的方式,以保护生态系统以及发展当地经济和当地人民。我们研究了这一政策的影响,并同时开发了一种理论建模方法,以了解在不断变化的政治、社会经济和环境条件下人类行为是如何变化的。一个具体重点是印度喜马拉雅地区山区的景观如何变化,该地区约10%的总面积已转变为用于保护生物多样性的受保护景观。对于生活在印度喜马拉雅山区的当地居民来说,农业是主要的土地利用活动,并且在提供可持续性方面与森林紧密相连。农村生态系统中有几个分支,当地人民的经济以这些分支为中心。这些分支包括农业、畜牧业、药用和芳香植物种植、森林资源采集、旅游业和其他职业。最大比例的人口从事农业部门,其在农村经济中的贡献很高(61%);其次是畜牧业(19%)、为获取经济利益而进行的森林资源采集(18%)以及药用和芳香植物种植(1.5%)。然而,三十年前,农村生态系统的畜牧业分支对农村家庭收入的贡献最大(40%),其次是旅游业(35.2%),最后是农业(14%)。农民从农业土地利用中获取最佳产出的愿望导致了从森林中采集资源的增加。人们(n = 1648)对该地区总体变化的看法各不相同,大多数人表示农村生态系统当前的趋势是由于实施保护政策/创建国家公园和生物圈保护区(80%),其次是限制因素(22%)、气候(20%)、人口增长(7%)、国民经济(10%),而社会经济变化的影响最小(5%)。这里开发的理论主体模型在时间维度上关注主体/农民的行为及其为生计而进行的土地资源利用。当前的研究将有助于引入新方法,以发展与喜马拉雅山区复杂的人类与生态系统相互作用相关的方法学和理论方面,实现可持续景观发展。