Suppr超能文献

圣犹达医疗公司和爱德华兹Duromedics双叶瓣膜的关闭喀喇音:瓣膜噪音引发的问题及其与声压和听力水平的关系

Closing click of St Jude Medical and Duromedics Edwards bileaflet valves: complaints created by valve noise and their relation to sound pressure and hearing level.

作者信息

Moritz A, Steinseifer U, Kobina G, Neuwirth-Riedl K, Wolters H, Reul H, Wolner E

机构信息

II. Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1991 Jun;12(6):673-9.

PMID:1860467
Abstract

The metallic clicking sound created by mechanical heart valve prostheses frequently bothers patients. To test whether sounds generated by different bileaflet valves correlate to complaints related to the prosthetic clicking 73 patients were investigated after valve replacement with Duromedics Edwards (DE) (n = 38) and St Jude Medical (SJM) (n = 35) valves. The patients were asked about their complaints, sound pressure levels were recorded and audiometry was performed. Sixty-five percent of patients could hear their valve, 18% had sleeping disturbances, 5% felt bothered during daytime and 12% would prefer a less noisy valve. In symptomatic patients, sound pressure levels were higher than in asymptomatic patients (valve audible 45 +/- 8 db(A) vs not audible 39.9 +/- 10 db(A) at 10 cm; P = 0.016). These differences were most apparent in the high frequency bands, corresponding to the metallic click. Symptomatic patients had better hearing and were younger than patients without complaints. Fifty-one percent could hear their valve by conduction through the body, after eliminating air conduction by the use of headsets. The DE prostheses were louder than the SJM valves in general (47.4 +/- 7 vs 39.8 +/- 5 db (A) at 10 cm; P = 0.001) and in each valve position. Patients with DE prostheses had significantly more complaints. The intensity of the closing click of mechanical valves correlates to the complaints caused by prosthetic clicking and thus sound emission should be considered when a mechanical heart valve prosthesis is selected.

摘要

机械心脏瓣膜假体产生的金属咔嗒声常常困扰着患者。为了测试不同双叶瓣膜产生的声音是否与假体咔嗒声相关的不适有关,我们对73例接受瓣膜置换术的患者进行了研究,其中38例植入了Duromedics Edwards(DE)瓣膜,35例植入了St Jude Medical(SJM)瓣膜。我们询问了患者的不适情况,记录了声压水平并进行了听力测定。65%的患者能听到自己的瓣膜声音,18%有睡眠障碍,5%在白天感到困扰,12%希望使用噪音更小的瓣膜。有症状的患者声压水平高于无症状患者(在10厘米处,瓣膜可听见时为45±8分贝(A),听不见时为39.9±10分贝(A);P = 0.016)。这些差异在对应金属咔嗒声的高频段最为明显。有症状的患者听力更好且比无不适的患者年轻。在使用耳机消除空气传导后,51%的患者能通过身体传导听到自己的瓣膜声音。总体而言,DE假体比SJM瓣膜更响亮(在10厘米处分别为47.4±7分贝(A)和39.8±5分贝(A);P = 0.001),在每个瓣膜位置都是如此。植入DE假体的患者有明显更多的不适。机械瓣膜关闭咔嗒声的强度与假体咔嗒声引起的不适相关,因此在选择机械心脏瓣膜假体时应考虑声音发射情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验