Suppr超能文献

机械心脏瓣膜假体声音对患者生活质量的影响。

Impact of mechanical heart valve prosthesis sound on patients' quality of life.

作者信息

Blome-Eberwein S A, Mrowinski D, Hofmeister J, Hetzer R

机构信息

Universitätsklinikum Rudolf Virchow, Department of Audiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Feb;61(2):594-602. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00937-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The "click" sound of mechanical heart valve prostheses has been recognized as a disturbing factor for some patients after mechanical heart valve implantation. The factors determining the extent of disturbance remain controversial.

METHODS

Ninety-five unmatched patients with six different valve types were examined (Duromedics-Edwards, Björk-Shiley, St. Jude Medical, Medtronic, CarboMedics, and Omnicarbon), including 12 patients with double-valve replacement. Three groups (Björk-Shiley, Duromedics-Edwards, and St. Jude Medical) were comparable in size. All patients were examined and interviewed, a hearing test was performed, and valve sounds were analyzed. Sound transmission was evaluated.

RESULTS

The loudest valve was the Duromedics-Edwards prosthesis (mean, 84.2 dB[A] impulse) and the St. Jude Medical was the quietest (mean, 73.5 dB[A] impulse). This ranking was independent of patient variables and valve position. Discomfort level correlated with hearing loss and loudness of the valve. Patients desiring a quieter valve had better hearing, had louder valve sounds, felt disturbed by the sound, had partners who felt disturbed, and were receiving coumarin for anticoagulation. Sound was transmitted predominantly by air conduction. The frequency analysis to identify different valves was unsatisfactory, but louder frequencies did correspond with hearing-impaired patients' audiograms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the need for valve design changes, preoperative education about the sound, and inclusion of routine hearing tests into the preoperative workup.

摘要

背景

机械心脏瓣膜假体的“咔嗒”声已被认为是机械心脏瓣膜植入术后一些患者的干扰因素。决定干扰程度的因素仍存在争议。

方法

对95例使用六种不同瓣膜类型(Duromedics-Edwards、Björk-Shiley、圣犹达医疗、美敦力、CarboMedics和Omnicarbon)的非配对患者进行了检查,其中包括12例接受双瓣膜置换的患者。三组(Björk-Shiley、Duromedics-Edwards和圣犹达医疗)规模相当。对所有患者进行了检查和访谈,进行了听力测试,并分析了瓣膜声音。评估了声音传播情况。

结果

声音最大的瓣膜是Duromedics-Edwards假体(平均84.2 dB[A]脉冲),圣犹达医疗的瓣膜最安静(平均73.5 dB[A]脉冲)。这种排名与患者变量和瓣膜位置无关。不适程度与听力损失和瓣膜声音大小相关。希望瓣膜更安静的患者听力更好、瓣膜声音更大、受到声音干扰、其伴侣也受到干扰,并且正在接受香豆素抗凝治疗。声音主要通过空气传导传播。用于识别不同瓣膜的频率分析并不理想,但较高频率确实与听力受损患者的听力图相对应。

结论

我们的结果强调了瓣膜设计改进的必要性、术前对声音的教育以及在术前检查中纳入常规听力测试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验