Hutchison Andrew J, Breckon Jeff D, Johnston Lynne H
Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5):829-45. doi: 10.1177/1090198108318491. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
This review critically examines Transtheoretical Model (TTM)-based interventions for physical activity (PA) behavior change. It has been suggested that the TTM may not be the most appropriate theoretical model for applications to PA behavior change. However, previous reviews have paid little or no attention to how accurately each intervention represents the TTM. Findings comprise two sections: sample characteristics of each intervention reviewed and a summary outlining the use of the TTM to develop the interventions. Results reveal numerous inconsistencies regarding the development and implementation/application of TTM-based interventions. Specifically, the majority of interventions reported to be based on the TTM fail to accurately represent all dimensions of the model. Therefore, until interventions are developed to accurately represent the TTM, the efficacy of these approaches and the appropriateness of the underpinning theoretical model cannot be determined.
本综述批判性地审视了基于跨理论模型(TTM)的身体活动(PA)行为改变干预措施。有人认为,TTM可能不是应用于PA行为改变的最合适理论模型。然而,以往的综述很少或根本没有关注每种干预措施对TTM的准确呈现程度。研究结果包括两个部分:所综述的每种干预措施的样本特征,以及概述使用TTM来制定干预措施的总结。结果揭示了基于TTM的干预措施在开发和实施/应用方面存在诸多不一致之处。具体而言,大多数报告称基于TTM的干预措施未能准确呈现该模型的所有维度。因此,在开发出能准确呈现TTM的干预措施之前,无法确定这些方法的有效性以及基础理论模型的适用性。