Suppr超能文献

孤立性肺结节和肿块:替代成像检查诊断效用的荟萃分析

Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests.

作者信息

Cronin Paul, Dwamena Ben A, Kelly Aine Marie, Bernstein Steven J, Carlos Ruth C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, B1 132F Taubman Center/0302, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0030, USA.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2008 Sep;18(9):1840-56. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0970-5. Epub 2008 Jul 8.

Abstract

The purpose was to assess the clinical utility of diagnostic tests for identifying malignancy within a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), and to create a nomogram or "look-up" table using clinical data and non-invasive radiology (positive) test results to estimate post-test probability of malignancy. Studies that examined computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the evaluation of SPN. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed study quality. Study-specific and overall positive likelihood ratios (LRs) for each diagnostic test confirming a diagnosis of malignancy and negative LR for each diagnostic test excluding a diagnosis of malignancy within an SPN were calculated. Forty-four of 242 articles were included. Positive LRs for diagnostic tests were: CT 3.91 (95% confidence interval 2.42, 5.40), MRI 4.57 (3.03, 6.1), PET 5.44 (3.56, 7.32) and SPECT 5.16 (4.03, 6.30). Negative LRs were: CT 0.10 (0.03, 0.16), MRI 0.08 (0.03, 0.12), PET 0.06 (0.02, 0.09) and SPECT 0.06 (0.04, 0.08). Differences in performance for all tests were negligible; therefore, the clinician may confidently use any of the four tests presented in further evaluating an SPN. Given the low cost and prevalence of the technology, SPECT appears to be the leading choice for additional testing in SPN evaluation.

摘要

目的是评估诊断测试在识别孤立性肺结节(SPN)内恶性肿瘤方面的临床效用,并使用临床数据和非侵入性放射学(阳性)测试结果创建列线图或“查找”表,以估计测试后恶性肿瘤的概率。研究检查了计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)用于评估SPN。两名评审员独立提取数据并评估研究质量。计算了每项确诊恶性肿瘤的诊断测试的研究特异性和总体阳性似然比(LRs),以及每项排除SPN内恶性肿瘤诊断的诊断测试的阴性似然比。242篇文章中有44篇被纳入。诊断测试的阳性似然比为:CT 3.91(95%置信区间2.42,5.40),MRI 4.57(3.03,6.1),PET 5.44(3.56,7.32)和SPECT 5.16(4.03,6.30)。阴性似然比为:CT 0.10(0.03,0.16),MRI 0.08(0.03,0.12),PET 0.06(0.02,0.09)和SPECT 0.06(0.04,0.08)。所有测试的性能差异可忽略不计;因此,临床医生在进一步评估SPN时可以放心使用所介绍的四种测试中的任何一种。鉴于该技术成本低且普及率高,SPECT似乎是SPN评估中进行额外测试的首选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验