Chen Guang-Xiang, Wang Mao-Hua, Zheng Ting, Tang Guang-Cai, Han Fu-Gang, Tu Guo-Jian
Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, P.R. China.
Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, P.R. China.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;6(3):344-354. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1153. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer. A systematic literature search was performed to identify eligible original studies. The quality of included studies was assessed using 'quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies' (QUADAS-2). Meta-analysis was performed to pool sensitivity and specificity, to calculate the positive likelihood ratio (PLR), the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and to construct the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. The homogeneity, threshold effect and publication bias were also investigated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. A total of 10 studies with 11 datasets met the inclusion criteria, which comprised 796 patients with a total of 2,433 lymph nodes. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.81] and the pooled diagnostic specificity was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.89). The PLR, NLR, and DOR were 7.11 (95% CI: 4.39-11.52), 0.24 (95% CI: 0.18-0.33), and 31.14 (95% CI: 17.32-55.98), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.90. No publication bias was found (bias=-0.15, P=0.887). Notable heterogeneity was, however, observed, and patient selection, type of lung cancer, number of enrolled lymph nodes, reference standard, B-value and the type of scanner were the sources of heterogeneity (P<0.05). No significant threshold effect was identified (P=0.537). In conclusion, DWI has been revealed to be a valuable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modality, with good diagnostic performance for distinguishing metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer. Therefore, DWI may be a useful supplement to conventional MRI techniques.
本荟萃分析的目的是评估扩散加权成像(DWI)在鉴别肺癌患者转移性和非转移性淋巴结方面的诊断价值。进行了系统的文献检索以确定符合条件的原始研究。使用“诊断准确性研究的质量评估”(QUADAS-2)对纳入研究的质量进行评估。进行荟萃分析以汇总敏感性和特异性,计算阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR),并构建汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。还研究了同质性、阈值效应和发表偏倚。进行荟萃回归分析以确定异质性来源。共有10项研究的11个数据集符合纳入标准,包括796例患者,共2433个淋巴结。汇总诊断敏感性为0.78[95%置信区间(CI):0.74 - 0.81],汇总诊断特异性为0.88(95%CI:0.86 - 0.89)。PLR、NLR和DOR分别为7.11(95%CI:4.39 - 11.52)、0.24(95%CI:0.18 - 0.33)和31.14(95%CI:17.32 - 55.98)。SROC曲线下面积为0.90。未发现发表偏倚(偏倚 = -0.15,P = 0.887)。然而,观察到显著的异质性,患者选择、肺癌类型、纳入淋巴结数量、参考标准、B值和扫描仪类型是异质性来源(P < 0.05)。未发现显著的阈值效应(P = 0.537)。总之,DWI已被证明是一种有价值的磁共振成像(MRI)模态,在鉴别肺癌患者转移性和非转移性淋巴结方面具有良好的诊断性能。因此,DWI可能是传统MRI技术的有用补充。