Ettner Susan L, Conover Christopher J, Proescholdbell Rae Jean, Weaver Marcia R, Ang Alfonso, Arno Peter S
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
AIDS Care. 2008 Nov;20(10):1177-89. doi: 10.1080/09540120801918644.
Although AIDS is a chronic illness, little is known about the patterns and correlates of long-term care use among triply diagnosed HIV patients. We examined nursing and home care use among 1,045 participants in the HIV/AIDS Treatment Adherence, Health Outcomes and Cost Study, a multi-site study of HIV-positive patients with at least one mental health and one substance disorder. Patient interviews and medical record review data were used to examine the average monthly cost of nursing home, formal home and informal home care. Multinomial logit and two-part regression models were used to identify correlates of the use of formal and informal home care and the number of informal home care hours used. During the three months prior to baseline, 2, 7 and 23% of participants used nursing home, formal home and informal home care, respectively. Patients who were better-educated, had higher incomes, had Medicaid insurance (with or without Medicare coverage) and whose transmission mode was homosexual sex had higher regression-adjusted probabilities of receiving any formal home care; Latinos and physically healthier patients had lower probabilities. Women and patients who abused drugs or alcohol (but not both) were more likely to receive informal care only. Overall, patients who were female, better-educated, physically or mentally sicker or single-substance abusers were more likely to receive any home care (either formal or informal), while those contracting HIV through heterosexual sex were less likely. Women received 28 more monthly hours of informal care than men and married patients received 31 more hours than unmarried patients. We conclude that at least one mutable policy factor (Medicaid insurance) is strongly associated with formal home care use among triply diagnosed patients. Further research is needed to explore possible implications for access among this vulnerable subpopulation.
尽管艾滋病是一种慢性病,但对于三重诊断的艾滋病毒患者长期护理使用的模式及相关因素知之甚少。我们在“艾滋病毒/艾滋病治疗依从性、健康结果和成本研究”的1045名参与者中调查了护理和家庭护理的使用情况,该研究是一项针对至少患有一种精神疾病和一种物质使用障碍的艾滋病毒阳性患者的多中心研究。通过患者访谈和病历审查数据来研究疗养院、正规家庭护理和非正规家庭护理的平均月费用。使用多项logit模型和两部分回归模型来确定正规和非正规家庭护理使用的相关因素以及非正规家庭护理使用时长。在基线前的三个月里,分别有2%、7%和23%的参与者使用了疗养院护理、正规家庭护理和非正规家庭护理。受教育程度较高、收入较高、拥有医疗补助保险(无论有无医疗保险覆盖)且传播方式为同性性行为的患者接受任何正规家庭护理的回归调整概率更高;拉丁裔和身体更健康的患者概率更低。女性以及滥用药物或酒精(但不同时滥用两者)的患者更有可能仅接受非正规护理。总体而言,女性、受教育程度较高、身体或精神状况较差或单一物质滥用者更有可能接受任何家庭护理(正规或非正规),而通过异性性行为感染艾滋病毒的患者可能性较小。女性每月接受的非正规护理时长比男性多28小时,已婚患者比未婚患者多31小时。我们得出结论,至少有一个可变的政策因素(医疗补助保险)与三重诊断患者的正规家庭护理使用密切相关。需要进一步研究来探讨这一弱势群体在获得护理方面可能产生的影响。