Suppr超能文献

有偿居家护理会侵蚀非正式支持吗?

Will paid home care erode informal support?

作者信息

Hanley R J, Wiener J M, Harris K M

机构信息

Brookings Institution.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 1991 Fall;16(3):507-21.

PMID:1837037
Abstract

One of the main barriers to the expansion of paid home care for the chronically disabled is the fear that policymakers have that it will cause friends and relatives to curtail their informal caregiving efforts. Using the first wave of the National Long-Term Care Survey, we examine whether the amount of paid home care used by disabled elderly persons had a significant influence on the amount of informal support they were receiving. Results from a two-stage least squares regression analysis suggest that the amount of informal home care received was not significantly affected by the level of formal care. This conclusion held for subgroups of formal care users most likely to exhibit substitution: those without cognitive problems, the disabled elderly with above average income, and persons who lived alone. Even the more severely disabled elderly, who are the target of most proposals to expand paid home care, did not substitute paid care for unpaid. Thus, our study suggests that an increase in paid home care will not erode informal support.

摘要

为慢性病患者提供付费居家护理服务的扩大面临的主要障碍之一,是政策制定者担心这会导致朋友和亲属减少他们的非正式护理努力。利用第一轮全国长期护理调查,我们研究了残疾老年人使用的付费居家护理量是否对他们所获得的非正式支持量有重大影响。两阶段最小二乘回归分析的结果表明,所获得的非正式居家护理量并未受到正式护理水平的显著影响。这一结论适用于最有可能出现替代情况的正式护理使用者亚组:没有认知问题的人、收入高于平均水平的残疾老年人以及独居者。即使是最严重残疾的老年人,他们是大多数扩大付费居家护理提议的目标群体,也没有用付费护理替代无偿护理。因此,我们的研究表明,付费居家护理的增加不会削弱非正式支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验