Fleishman J A
Center for Cost and Financing, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1997 Jun;32(2):155-75.
To examine factors affecting the utilization of formal and informal home care services by people with HIV infection.
Study participants are adults with HIV infection receiving services at major providers of medical care in ten U.S. cities. Six interviews were conducted over an 18-month period (March 1991 to September 1992).
Data on home care utilization, personal background characteristics, insurance status, and functional status are based on self-report. Disease stage is based on medical record data.
This is an observational study using a panel survey design. Cross-tabular and longitudinal regression analyses (N = 1,727) were conducted to determine the effects of sociodemographic factors, functional status, disease stage, and insurance status on the receipt of home care from nurses, paraprofessionals, other professional providers, household residents, nonresident family and friends, and volunteers.
Over a 12-month period, 16 percent of respondents received home nursing visits; 11 percent received paraprofessional care (e.g., nurse's aides, helpers); 4 percent received help from volunteers; 11 percent from non-resident family or friends, and 21 percent from household members. Among the subgroup with AIDS (n = 837), corresponding percentages were 29, 20, 7, 17, and 29 percent for each provider type. In multivariate analyses, illness stage and functional status had strong effects on odds of utilization. Blacks and Hispanics were less likely than whites to have nursing care, but racial/ethnic group did not affect receipt of informal care.
Home care utilization is concentrated among people with AIDS, compared to those at less advanced disease stages. In addition to functional limitations, fatigue is associated with the use of home care. Nursing and non-nursing home care have somewhat different correlates. Medicaid may provide better coverage of personal care services than private insurance.
研究影响艾滋病毒感染者使用正规和非正规家庭护理服务的因素。
研究参与者为在美国十个城市主要医疗服务机构接受服务的成年艾滋病毒感染者。在18个月期间(1991年3月至1992年9月)进行了六次访谈。
家庭护理使用情况、个人背景特征、保险状况和功能状态的数据基于自我报告。疾病阶段基于病历数据。
这是一项采用面板调查设计的观察性研究。进行了交叉表和纵向回归分析(N = 1727),以确定社会人口因素、功能状态、疾病阶段和保险状况对从护士、辅助专业人员、其他专业提供者、家庭居民、非居民家人和朋友以及志愿者那里接受家庭护理的影响。
在12个月期间,16%的受访者接受了家庭护理访视;11%接受了辅助专业护理(如护士助理、助手);4%接受了志愿者的帮助;11%来自非居民家人或朋友,21%来自家庭成员。在艾滋病亚组(n = 837)中,每种提供者类型的相应百分比分别为29%、20%、7%、17%和29%。在多变量分析中,疾病阶段和功能状态对使用几率有强烈影响。黑人和西班牙裔比白人接受护理的可能性更小,但种族/族裔群体不影响接受非正规护理。
与疾病阶段较轻的人相比,家庭护理的使用集中在艾滋病患者中。除了功能限制外,疲劳与家庭护理的使用有关。护理和非护理家庭护理有一些不同的关联因素。医疗补助可能比私人保险能更好地覆盖个人护理服务。