Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov;30(8):885-91. doi: 10.1080/13803390701858224. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
The criterion validity of the Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT) was investigated using a sample of 53 patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a demographically matched control group from the standardization sample. There was a statistically significant main effect of groups for both CVMT Total and Delayed Recognition scores ( p < .0001). Hierarchical linear regression analyses suggested that, in the clinical group, the effect of injury severity on the CVMT Total score was mediated by visuospatial ability. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the CVMT Total score correctly classified about three quarters of the combined participants, with slightly better specificity than sensitivity. It is concluded that the CVMT is a clinically useful instrument with satisfactory criterion validity but that it should not be used in isolation to determine the presence or absence of memory impairment.
采用来自标准化样本的 53 例中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者和一个年龄匹配的对照组,对连续视觉记忆测试(CVMT)的效标效度进行了研究。CVMT 总分数和延迟识别分数在组间存在统计学显著的主效应(p<.0001)。分层线性回归分析表明,在临床组中,损伤严重程度对 CVMT 总分数的影响,由视空间能力介导。逻辑回归分析显示,CVMT 总分数正确分类了大约四分之三的合并参与者,特异性略优于敏感性。结论是 CVMT 是一种具有满意效标效度的临床有用工具,但不应单独使用来确定是否存在记忆障碍。