• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提交给《普通内科杂志》的医学教育稿件的拟议标准。

Proposed standards for medical education submissions to the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

作者信息

Cook David A, Bowen Judith L, Gerrity Martha S, Kalet Adina L, Kogan Jennifer R, Spickard Anderson, Wayne Diane B

机构信息

Office of Education Research and Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):908-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0676-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-008-0676-z
PMID:18612716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2517930/
Abstract

To help authors design rigorous studies and prepare clear and informative manuscripts, improve the transparency of editorial decisions, and raise the bar on educational scholarship, the Deputy Editors of the Journal of General Internal Medicine articulate standards for medical education submissions to the Journal. General standards include: (1) quality questions, (2) quality methods to match the questions, (3) insightful interpretation of findings, (4) transparent, unbiased reporting, and (5) attention to human subjects' protection and ethical research conduct. Additional standards for specific study types are described. We hope these proposed standards will generate discussion that will foster their continued evolution.

摘要

为帮助作者设计严谨的研究并撰写清晰且信息丰富的稿件,提高编辑决策的透明度,并提升医学教育学术水平,《普通内科杂志》的副主编阐述了向该杂志提交医学教育相关稿件的标准。一般标准包括:(1)高质量的问题,(2)与问题相匹配的高质量方法,(3)对研究结果有深刻见解的解读,(4)透明、无偏见的报告,以及(5)关注人类受试者保护和符合伦理的研究行为。文中还描述了针对特定研究类型的其他标准。我们希望这些提议的标准能引发讨论,促进其不断完善。

相似文献

1
Proposed standards for medical education submissions to the Journal of General Internal Medicine.提交给《普通内科杂志》的医学教育稿件的拟议标准。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):908-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0676-z.
2
Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.医学教育研究质量工具分数的预测效度证据:提交至《美国医学会杂志·内科学》医学教育特刊的稿件质量
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):903-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0664-3.
3
Responsible research publication: international standards for editors.负责任的研究发表:编辑的国际标准
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(3):35-41. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2015-0006.
4
[Statistical reporting requirements for medical journals: Amplifications and explanations].[医学期刊的统计报告要求:扩充与解释]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 10;40(1):99-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.01.020.
5
Ethical issues in studying submissions to a medical journal.研究医学期刊投稿中的伦理问题。
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):290-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.290.
6
Minimum statistical standards for submissions to Neuroimage: Clinical.提交至《神经影像学:临床》的最低统计标准。
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Nov 2;12:1045-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.08.002. eCollection 2016.
7
Enhancing the reporting of implementation research.加强实施研究的报告。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 8;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0546-3.
8
[The relevance of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for medical publishing and research].[国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)对医学出版与研究的相关性]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jan;142(1):79-83. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000100012.
9
Ethics and methods for biological rhythm research on animals and human beings.动物和人类生物节律研究的伦理和方法。
Chronobiol Int. 2010 Oct;27(9-10):1911-29. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.516381.
10
How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?编辑是如何被挑选、招募和批准的?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1801-1804. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Essential Foundational Education Research Methods Articles for Graduate Medical Educators: A Delphi Study.研究生医学教育者必备基础教育研究方法文章:德尔菲研究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Oct;16(5):601-606. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00941.1. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Conducting high-quality research in cardiothoracic surgical education: Recommendations from the Thoracic Education Cooperative Group.开展高质量的心胸外科教育研究:来自胸科教育合作组的建议。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;157(2):820-827.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.117. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
3
The Uphill Battle of Performing Education Scholarship: Barriers Educators and Education Researchers Face.从事教育学术研究的困境:教育工作者与教育研究者面临的障碍。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 May;19(3):619-629. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.1.36752. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Medical student attitudes and educational interventions to prevent neurophobia: a longitudinal study.医学生预防神经恐惧症的态度和教育干预:一项纵向研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1055-4.
5
Exploring Scholarship and the Emergency Medicine Educator: A Workforce Study.探索奖学金与急诊医学教育者:劳动力研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):163-168. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.32636. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Education Scholarship Fellowships: An Emerging Model for Creating Educational Leaders.教育奖学金:培养教育领导者的新兴模式。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Dec;8(5):668-673. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00616.1.
7
Redefining Quality in Medical Education Research: A Consumer's View.重新定义医学教育研究的质量:消费者视角
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Sep;6(3):424-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00339.1.
8
Navigating the JGIM Special Issue on Medical Education.解读《普通内科医学杂志》医学教育特刊
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):899-902. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0675-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.医学教育研究质量工具分数的预测效度证据:提交至《美国医学会杂志·内科学》医学教育特刊的稿件质量
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):903-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0664-3.
2
The reputation of medical education research: quasi-experimentation and unresolved threats to validity.医学教育研究的声誉:准实验法与效度面临的未解决威胁
Teach Learn Med. 2008 Apr-Jun;20(2):101-3. doi: 10.1080/10401330801989497.
3
Reflections on experimental research in medical education.医学教育实验研究的反思。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Aug;15(3):455-64. doi: 10.1007/s10459-008-9117-3. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
4
Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation.与罗非昔布相关出版物中的客座作者身份和代笔行为:以罗非昔布诉讼中的行业文件为例
JAMA. 2008 Apr 16;299(15):1800-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.1800.
5
Full disclosure and the funding of biomedical research.生物医学研究的全面披露与资金投入。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 24;358(17):1850-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0802618. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
6
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.将CONSORT声明扩展至非药物治疗随机试验:解释与详述
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):295-309. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008.
7
Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education.描述、理由与阐释:医学教育研究目的分类框架
Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):128-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02974.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
8
A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing.对医学教育实验研究的标题和摘要进行的系统评价:许多信息要素缺失。
Med Educ. 2007 Nov;41(11):1074-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02861.x.
9
Our continuing interest in manuscripts about education.我们对有关教育的手稿一直感兴趣。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Sep;12(9):583-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07115.x.
10
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010.