Mastrangelo G, Marcer G, Cegolon L, Buja A, Fadda E, Scoizzato L, Pavanello S
Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Padova University Medical School, via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Med Hypotheses. 2008 Oct;71(4):551-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.05.016. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
The basis of World Health Organization strategy for leprosy elimination is that the only source and reservoir for infection are patients with the disease. It was assumed that multi drug therapy (MDT) would reduce transmission of Mycobacterium leprae, but there is no convincing evidence for this. Furthermore, even if MDT has been proved to be extremely effective against the infectious disease, a noticeable proportion of leprosy patients can suffer from immunologic hypersensitivity reactions which are now the most significant issue in the managements of the disease. In endemic areas it was found that: M. leprae survives outside human body; healthy individuals harbor M. leprae bacilli in nasal cavity and shed micro-organisms in environment; there is widespread subclinical transmission of M. leprae with transient infection of the nose resulting in the development of a mucosal immune response. This disparate clinical, epidemiologic, and microbiologic evidence leads to the first hypothesis: that antigenic load in local tissues, sufficient to trigger the immune response, comes from external supply of M. leprae organisms. The hypothiocyanite anion (OSCN-) is generated in vivo by the reaction of thiocyanate with hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by lactoperoxidase. OSCN- is an antimicrobial oxidizing agent that prevents growth of bacteria, fungi, and viruses. OSNC- exists in lower airway secretions and lung has never been reported to be affected by leprosy. There is a sufficient concentration of OSCN- in the saliva, and accordingly mouth is rarely affected by leprosy. By contrast, the concentration of this compound is low or nil in nasal and lacrimal secretions and leprosy very often affects nose and eyes. The second hypothesis is that OSCN- may also protect from leprosy. Recently a method of OSCN- production, not involving enzymatic steps or use of toxic heavy-metal salts, has been patented. Studies on the susceptibility of M. leprae to hypothiocyanite could be carried out and, in case of positive results, the substance might be used in order to sterilize the nasal cavity of healthy carriers and prevent transmission of M. leprae to healthy subjects and to leprosy patients in whom it may trigger an immune response.
世界卫生组织消除麻风病战略的依据是,感染的唯一来源和宿主是麻风病患者。曾假定多药疗法(MDT)会减少麻风分枝杆菌的传播,但尚无令人信服的证据支持这一点。此外,即使多药疗法已被证明对这种传染病极为有效,但仍有相当比例的麻风病患者会出现免疫超敏反应,而这如今是该疾病管理中最为重要的问题。在麻风病流行地区发现:麻风分枝杆菌可在人体外存活;健康个体鼻腔中携带麻风分枝杆菌,并向环境中释放微生物;麻风分枝杆菌存在广泛的亚临床传播,鼻腔短暂感染会引发黏膜免疫反应。这些不同的临床、流行病学和微生物学证据引出了第一个假设:足以触发免疫反应的局部组织中的抗原负荷来自麻风分枝杆菌生物体的外部供应。次硫氰酸阴离子(OSCN-)是由硫氰酸盐与过氧化氢在乳过氧化物酶催化下于体内反应生成的。OSCN-是一种抗菌氧化剂,可阻止细菌、真菌和病毒生长。OSNC-存在于下呼吸道分泌物中,且从未有报道称肺部会受到麻风病影响。唾液中存在足够浓度的OSCN-,因此口腔很少受到麻风病影响。相比之下,这种化合物在鼻腔和泪液分泌物中的浓度较低或为零,而麻风病常常会影响鼻子和眼睛。第二个假设是OSCN-也可能预防麻风病。最近,一种不涉及酶促步骤或使用有毒重金属盐的OSCN-生产方法已获得专利。可以开展关于麻风分枝杆菌对次硫氰酸敏感性的研究,如果结果呈阳性,该物质可用于对健康携带者的鼻腔进行消毒,防止麻风分枝杆菌传播给健康受试者以及可能引发免疫反应的麻风病患者。