Chaudhuri S, Hajra S K, Mukherjee A, Saha B, Mazumder B, Chattapadhya D, Saha K
Department of Leprosy, School of Tropical Medicine, Calcutta, India.
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1998 Jun;66(2):182-9.
It is amazing how after years of scientific research and therapeutic progress many simple and basic questions about protective immunity against Mycobacterium leprae remain unanswered. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended short-term multidrug therapy (WHO/MDT) for the treatment of paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, from time to time several workers from different parts of the globe have reported inadequate clinical responses in a few tuberculoid and indeterminate leprosy patients following adequate WHO/MDT despite the fact that they are Mitsuda responsive. A few borderline tuberculoid patients harbor acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in their nerves for many years even though they become clinically inactive following MDT, a fact which has been ignored by many leprosy field workers. Keeping these patients in mind, we have attempted to investigate the cause of the persistence of AFB in PB cases and have looked into the question of why Mitsuda positivity in tuberculoid and indeterminate leprosy patients, as well as in healthy contacts, is not invariably a guarantee for protectivity against the leprosy bacilli. We have: a) analyzed the histological features of lepromin-induced granulomas, b) studied the bacteria-clearing capacity of the macrophages within such granulomas, and c) studied the in vitro leukocyte migration inhibition factor released by the blood leukocytes of these subjects when M. leprae sonicates have been used as an elicitor. The results of these three tests in the three groups of subjects have been compared and led us to conclude that the bacteria-clearing capacity of the macrophages within lepromin-induced granuloma (positive CCB test) may be taken as an indicator of the capability of elimination of leprosy bacilli and protective immunity against the disease. This important macrophage function is not invariably present in all tuberculoid and indeterminate leprosy patients or in all contacts even though they are Mitsuda responsive and are able to show a positive leukocyte migration inhibition (LMI) test. It is likely but not certain that this deficit of the macrophage is genetically predetermined and persists after completion of short-term WHO/MDT. Thus, after discontinuation of treatment slow-growing, persisting M. leprae multiply within macrophages leading to relapse.
令人惊讶的是,经过多年的科学研究和治疗进展,许多关于针对麻风杆菌的保护性免疫的简单基本问题仍然没有答案。尽管世界卫生组织(WHO)已推荐短期多药疗法(WHO/MDT)用于治疗少菌型(PB)麻风患者,但不时有来自全球不同地区的一些工作人员报告称,少数结核样型和未定类麻风患者在接受充分的WHO/MDT治疗后临床反应不佳,尽管他们对麻风菌素呈阳性反应。一些界线结核样型患者的神经中多年来一直存在抗酸杆菌(AFB),尽管他们在MDT治疗后临床症状消失,但这一事实被许多麻风病现场工作人员忽视了。考虑到这些患者,我们试图调查PB病例中AFB持续存在的原因,并研究为什么结核样型和未定类麻风患者以及健康接触者中的麻风菌素阳性并不总是保证对麻风杆菌具有保护性免疫力。我们进行了以下研究:a)分析麻风菌素诱导的肉芽肿的组织学特征,b)研究此类肉芽肿内巨噬细胞的细菌清除能力,c)研究当以麻风杆菌超声裂解物作为激发剂时,这些受试者血液白细胞释放的体外白细胞迁移抑制因子。对这三组受试者的这三项测试结果进行了比较,得出的结论是,麻风菌素诱导的肉芽肿内巨噬细胞的细菌清除能力(CCB测试阳性)可作为消除麻风杆菌能力和对该疾病保护性免疫的指标。这种重要的巨噬细胞功能并非在所有结核样型和未定类麻风患者或所有接触者中都始终存在,尽管他们对麻风菌素呈阳性反应且能够显示阳性白细胞迁移抑制(LMI)测试。巨噬细胞的这种缺陷很可能但不确定是由基因预先决定的,并且在短期WHO/MDT治疗完成后仍然存在。因此,在停止治疗后,生长缓慢、持续存在的麻风杆菌在巨噬细胞内繁殖导致复发。