Suppr超能文献

通过对重症患者持续输注时间依赖性抗生素能获得更好的治疗效果?

Better outcomes through continuous infusion of time-dependent antibiotics to critically ill patients?

作者信息

Roberts Jason A, Lipman Jeffrey, Blot Stijn, Rello Jordi

机构信息

Burns Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Aug;14(4):390-6. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283021b3a.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasing interest is being directed toward possible benefits associated with continuous infusion of time-dependent antibiotics such as beta-lactams and vancomycin to critically ill patients. The background, emerging evidence and practical considerations associated with continuous infusions are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

One large retrospective cohort study has found clinical outcome benefits of administering a beta-lactam antibiotic by extended infusion compared with bolus administration. This complements a smaller randomized controlled trial comparing continuous infusion and intermittent bolus administration. For vancomycin, clinical outcome benefits have only been shown in a ventilator-associated pneumonia cohort of critically ill patients. No clinical outcome studies have been conducted for other time-dependent antibiotics.

SUMMARY

Continuous infusion of vancomycin and beta-lactam antibiotics enables faster and more consistent attainment of therapeutic levels compared with intermittent bolus dosing. Although the clinical benefits have not been conclusively shown at this time, compelling pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic support for continuous infusion nevertheless exists. Given that critically ill patients may develop very large volumes of distribution as well as supranormal drug clearances, individualized therapy through the use of therapeutic drug monitoring is required. A definitive determination of the relative clinical efficacy of intermittent bolus and continuous administration of beta-lactams or vancomycin will only be achieved after a large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trial has been performed.

摘要

综述目的

越来越多的关注聚焦于持续输注时间依赖性抗生素(如β-内酰胺类和万古霉素)给重症患者带来的潜在益处。本文讨论了与持续输注相关的背景、新出现的证据及实际考量因素。

最新发现

一项大型回顾性队列研究发现,与静脉推注相比,延长输注β-内酰胺类抗生素可带来临床结局益处。这补充了一项比较持续输注和间歇性静脉推注的小型随机对照试验。对于万古霉素,仅在重症患者呼吸机相关性肺炎队列中显示出临床结局益处。尚未针对其他时间依赖性抗生素开展临床结局研究。

总结

与间歇性静脉推注给药相比,持续输注万古霉素和β-内酰胺类抗生素能够更快、更稳定地达到治疗浓度。尽管目前尚未确凿证明其临床益处,但持续输注仍有令人信服的药代动力学/药效学支持。鉴于重症患者可能出现分布容积极大以及药物清除超常的情况,需要通过治疗药物监测进行个体化治疗。只有在进行大规模多中心随机对照试验后,才能明确确定间歇性静脉推注与持续输注β-内酰胺类或万古霉素的相对临床疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验