Miller Steven F, White Jessica L, Ciochon Russell L
Department of Anthropology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 Oct;137(2):201-12. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20856.
This study provides a survey of mandibular shape in a sample of extant hominoids (Pan, Gorilla, Pongo, and Hylobates), as well as extinct Asian and Eurasian taxa (Ouranopithecus, Sivapithecus, and Gigantopithecus) in order to compare overall shape similarity. Results presented call into question differences in mandible shape recently used to distinguish Gigantopithecus giganteus from Gigantopithecus blacki and to justify resurrecting a different generic designation, "Indopithecus," for the former. It is concluded that while the two large-bodied Asian taxa may have been adapted to slightly different dietary niches with different geographic and temporal ranges, the unique mandibular/dental characters that the two taxa share should not be viewed as independent evolutionary developments.
本研究对现存类人猿(黑猩猩属、大猩猩属、红毛猩猩属和长臂猿属)样本以及已灭绝的亚洲和欧亚类群(希腊古猿属、西瓦古猿属和巨猿属)的下颌形状进行了调查,以便比较整体形状的相似性。所呈现的结果对最近用于区分巨型猿和步氏巨猿的下颌形状差异提出了质疑,并对为前者重新启用不同的属名“印度古猿”的合理性提出了质疑。研究得出的结论是,虽然这两个大体型的亚洲类群可能因地理和时间范围不同而适应了略有不同的饮食生态位,但这两个类群共有的独特下颌/牙齿特征不应被视为独立的进化发展。