Geurts Hilde M, Grasman Raoul P P P, Verté Sylvie, Oosterlaan Jaap, Roeyers Herbert, van Kammen Serena M, Sergeant Joseph A
Department of Psychonomics, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Roeterstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Nov;46(13):3030-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Jun 21.
The potential for response variability to serve as an endophenotype for attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) rests, in part, upon the development of reliable and valid methods to decompose variability. This study investigated the specificity of intra-individual variability (IIV) in 53 children with ADHD by comparing them with 25 children with high functioning autism (HFA), 32 children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), who also were comorbid for ADHD (ASD+ADHD), 21 children with Tourette's syndrome (TS), and 85 typically developing controls (TD). In order to decompose the variability of the reaction times, we applied three distinct techniques: ex-Gaussian modeling, intra-individual variability analysis, and spectral analysis. Our data revealed that children with HFA and children with ASD+ADHD exhibited substantial IIV compared with ADHD and TD children. We argue that: (1) all three methods lead to a single consistent conclusion; (2) careful documentation of the analytic steps used in spectral analysis is mandatory for comparison between studies; (3) the presence of comorbidities may constitute an important factor in the observed response variability in previous studies of ADHD.
反应变异性作为注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)内表型的潜力,部分取决于开发可靠且有效的方法来分解变异性。本研究通过将53名ADHD儿童与25名高功能自闭症(HFA)儿童、32名自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)且共患ADHD(ASD+ADHD)的儿童、21名妥瑞氏症(TS)儿童以及85名发育正常的对照儿童(TD)进行比较,研究了个体内变异性(IIV)的特异性。为了分解反应时间的变异性,我们应用了三种不同的技术:前高斯建模、个体内变异性分析和频谱分析。我们的数据显示,与ADHD儿童和TD儿童相比,HFA儿童和ASD+ADHD儿童表现出显著的IIV。我们认为:(1)所有三种方法都得出了一致的结论;(2)为便于研究间的比较,必须仔细记录频谱分析中使用的分析步骤;(3)共病的存在可能是以往ADHD研究中观察到的反应变异性的一个重要因素。