• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心电图门控多排螺旋计算机断层扫描对主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣面积的定量分析及两种图像分析方法的比较

Quantification of aortic valve area with ECG-gated multi-detector spiral computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis and comparison of two image analysis methods.

作者信息

Leborgne Laurent, Choplin Yoann, Renard Cédric, Claeys Mathieu, Levy Franck, Jarry Geneviéve, Rey Jean-Luc, Remond Alexandre, Quiret Jean-Claude, Tribouilloy Christophe

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 26;135(2):266-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.095. Epub 2008 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.095
PMID:18619692
Abstract

Thirty-three consecutive patients with aortic stenosis underwent a 16-row spiral CT scan. Aortic valve planimetry was performed using two methods: double-oblique reformation (DO) and 2D-curved multiplanar reconstruction using advanced vessel analysis software (VA). The mean aortic valve area determined by transthoracic echocardiography was 0.88+/-0.34 [0.53-1.88] and did not differ significantly from that determined by CT (DO): 0.87+/-0.38 [0.42-1.93] (p=0.75) or CT (VA): 0.87+/-0.38 [0.44-2.00] (p=0.69). This study demonstrates that 16-row spiral CT scan is a feasible, accurate and reproducible method for aortic valve planimetry in patients with aortic stenosis. Both methods show similar accuracy but the VA method takes slightly longer.

摘要

连续33例主动脉瓣狭窄患者接受了16排螺旋CT扫描。采用两种方法进行主动脉瓣平面测量:双斜位重建(DO)和使用先进血管分析软件(VA)的二维曲面多平面重建。经胸超声心动图测定的平均主动脉瓣面积为0.88±0.34[0.53 - 1.88],与CT(DO)测定的结果0.87±0.38[0.42 - 1.93](p = 0.75)或CT(VA)测定的结果0.87±0.38[0.44 - 2.00](p = 0.69)相比,差异无统计学意义。本研究表明,16排螺旋CT扫描是一种用于主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣平面测量的可行、准确且可重复的方法。两种方法显示出相似的准确性,但VA方法所需时间略长。

相似文献

1
Quantification of aortic valve area with ECG-gated multi-detector spiral computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis and comparison of two image analysis methods.心电图门控多排螺旋计算机断层扫描对主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣面积的定量分析及两种图像分析方法的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 26;135(2):266-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.095. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
2
Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis.心电门控多排CT用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄的瓣膜形态和钙化情况。
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):120-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011703.
3
Preliminary experience in the assessment of aortic valve calcification by ECG-gated multislice spiral computed tomography.心电图门控多层螺旋计算机断层扫描评估主动脉瓣钙化的初步经验。
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 10;102(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.017.
4
Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization.40层螺旋计算机断层扫描定量评估主动脉瓣狭窄的准确性:与超声心动图比较及与心导管检查对照验证
Invest Radiol. 2008 Oct;43(10):719-28. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318184d7c5.
5
Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area.使用主动脉瓣面积平面测量法的64层CT对主动脉瓣狭窄的评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jul;189(1):197-203. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2069.
6
The simultaneous assessment of aortic valve area and coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis comparison with echocardiography.在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中使用16层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描同时评估主动脉瓣面积和冠状动脉狭窄:与超声心动图的比较
Circ J. 2007 Oct;71(10):1593-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1593.
7
Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.主动脉瓣口面积的平面测量:多层螺旋 CT 与磁共振成像的对比。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Mar;77(3):426-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
8
Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.双源 CT 对主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣口面积的定量评估与经胸超声心动图及有创血流动力学评估的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Dec 1;104(11):1561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.024.
9
Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.磁共振成像与双源计算机断层扫描测量主动脉瓣面积的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2009 Jul;50(6):645-51. doi: 10.1080/02841850902902540.
10
Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Dec;191(6):1652-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3703.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology and the Brazilian College of Radiology - 2024.巴西心脏病学会和巴西放射学会心血管计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像指南 - 2024年
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Oct 28;121(9):e20240608. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240608.
2
Differences in aortic valve area measured on cardiac CT and echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.心脏 CT 和超声心动图测量主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣面积的差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280530. eCollection 2023.
3
Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.
韩国心脏CT合理使用指南。
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;16(2):251-85. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.251. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
4
Imaging of cardiac valves by computed tomography.心脏瓣膜的计算机断层扫描成像
Scientifica (Cairo). 2013;2013:270579. doi: 10.1155/2013/270579. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
5
Feasibility of aortic valve assessment with low dose prospectively triggered adaptive systolic (PTAS) cardiac computed tomography angiography.低剂量前瞻性触发自适应收缩期(PTAS)心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影评估主动脉瓣的可行性。
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Apr 20;6:158. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-158.
6
Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography.主动脉瓣面积:与经胸超声心动图相比,多排计算机断层扫描测量主动脉瓣面积诊断性能的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Aug;25(6):601-9. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9464-z. Epub 2009 May 7.