• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prehospital transport of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective.急性心肌梗死患者的院前转运:基于社区范围的视角
Heart Lung. 2008 Jul-Aug;37(4):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.05.013.
2
Community trends in the use and characteristics of persons with acute myocardial infarction who are transported by emergency medical services.社区中接受紧急医疗服务转运的急性心肌梗死患者的使用情况和特征趋势。
Heart Lung. 2012 Jul-Aug;41(4):323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
3
Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.急性心肌梗死中紧急医疗服务的使用及后续护理质量:来自全国心肌梗死注册研究2的观察结果
Circulation. 2002 Dec 10;106(24):3018-23. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000041246.20352.03.
4
Outcomes of non-STEMI patients transported by emergency medical services vs private vehicle.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者通过紧急医疗服务转运与私家车转运的结局对比。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.070. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
5
Analysis of barriers associated with emergency medical service activation in patients with acute stroke and acute myocardial infarction from Zhongjiang County of Sichuan Province in China.中国四川省中江县急性卒中与急性心肌梗死患者的急救医疗服务启动相关障碍分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01035-5.
6
Characteristics of and outcome for patients with chest pain in relation to transport by the emergency medical services in a 20-year perspective.20 年来胸痛患者的特点和急救医疗服务转运的结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;30(9):1788-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 May 23.
7
Inappropriate use of emergency medical services transport: comparison of provider and patient perspectives.急诊医疗服务运输的不当使用:提供者与患者观点的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;6(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00088.x.
8
Leukocytosis and adverse hospital outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后的白细胞增多与不良医院结局
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Aug 15;92(4):368-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00651-9.
9
Effects of EMS transportation on time to diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department.急诊医疗服务(EMS)转运对急诊科急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗时间的影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994 Jul-Sep;9(3):160-4. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00041273.
10
Prehospital evaluation of non-transported pediatric patients by a large emergency medical services system.大型紧急医疗服务系统对未转运儿科患者的院前评估。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Dec;17(6):421-4. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200112000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Community trends in the use and characteristics of persons with acute myocardial infarction who are transported by emergency medical services.社区中接受紧急医疗服务转运的急性心肌梗死患者的使用情况和特征趋势。
Heart Lung. 2012 Jul-Aug;41(4):323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
2
Reviewing time intervals from onset of the symptoms to thrombolytic therapy in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).回顾ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者从症状发作到溶栓治疗的时间间隔。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2010 Dec;15(Suppl 1):379-85.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between prepayment systems and emergency medical services use among patients with acute chest discomfort syndrome.预付款制度与急性胸痛综合征患者急诊医疗服务使用的关联。
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;35(6):573-578. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(00)70030-8. Epub 2005 Nov 4.
2
Comparison of mortality patterns in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction arriving by emergency medical services versus self-transport (from the prospective Ottawa Hospital STEMI Registry).急诊医疗服务运送与自行前往的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者死亡率模式比较(来自渥太华医院前瞻性ST段抬高型心肌梗死登记处)
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 15;97(4):458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.069. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
3
Trends in community mortality due to coronary heart disease.冠心病所致社区死亡率的趋势。
Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.024.
4
Trends in prehospital delay time and use of emergency medical services for acute myocardial infarction: experience in 4 US communities from 1987-2000.急性心肌梗死患者院前延误时间及急诊医疗服务使用情况的趋势:1987 - 2000年美国4个社区的经验
Am Heart J. 2005 Sep;150(3):392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.064.
5
A 25-year perspective into the changing landscape of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (the Worcester Heart Attack Study).对急性心肌梗死住院患者不断变化的情况进行25年的观察(伍斯特心脏病发作研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Dec 1;94(11):1373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.142.
6
Patients with chest pain calling 9-1-1 or self-transporting to reach definitive care: which mode is quicker?因胸痛呼叫911或自行前往接受最终治疗的患者:哪种方式更快?
Am Heart J. 2004 Jan;147(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00510-6.
7
Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.急性心肌梗死中紧急医疗服务的使用及后续护理质量:来自全国心肌梗死注册研究2的观察结果
Circulation. 2002 Dec 10;106(24):3018-23. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000041246.20352.03.
8
Recent trends in the incidence rates of and death rates from atrial fibrillation complicating initial acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective.初发性急性心肌梗死并发心房颤动的发病率和死亡率的近期趋势:基于社区范围的视角
Am Heart J. 2002 Mar;143(3):519-27. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.120410.
9
Decade-long trends (1986 to 1997) in the medical treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A community-wide perspective.急性心肌梗死患者医疗治疗的十年趋势(1986年至1997年):社区范围视角
Am Heart J. 2001 Oct;142(4):594-603. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.117776.
10
Twenty-two year (1975 to 1997) trends in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case fatality rates from initial Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a multi-hospital, community-wide perspective.1975年至1997年期间,22年里初始Q波型和非Q波型心肌梗死的发病率、住院病死率及长期病死率趋势:多医院、全社区视角研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 May;37(6):1571-80. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01203-7.

急性心肌梗死患者的院前转运:基于社区范围的视角

Prehospital transport of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective.

作者信息

Goldberg Robert J, Kramer Daniel G, Yarzebski Jorge, Lessard Darleen, Gore Joel M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2008 Jul-Aug;37(4):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.05.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.05.013
PMID:18620102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4024827/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this population-based study were to examine the use of emergency medical services (EMS) in greater Worcester, Massachusetts, residents (2000 census = 478,000) hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at all metropolitan Worcester medical centers in four biennial periods between 1997 and 2003. A secondary study aim was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with AMI transported to metropolitan Worcester hospitals by EMS, compared with those transported by other means, and their hospital outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 3805 patients hospitalized for confirmed AMI at 11 greater Worcester medical centers during 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2003. Information about the use of EMS, patient characteristics, and hospital outcomes was obtained through the review of hospital charts.

RESULTS

A total of 2693 greater Worcester residents with AMI (70.8%) were transported to area hospitals by ambulance. Patients transported by ambulance were older, were more likely to be women, had a greater prevalence of comorbidities, and had a different symptom profile than patients transported by other means. Patients arriving at greater Worcester hospitals by ambulance were more likely to develop serious clinical complications, including heart failure and cardiogenic shock, and die during hospitalization compared with patients not transported by EMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the majority of greater Worcester residents seeking care for AMI are transported by EMS. Patients transported by ambulance differ from patients transported by other means and are more likely to experience adverse hospital outcomes. The reasons why patients use EMS in the setting of AMI need to be further explored and patients' care-seeking behavior enhanced.

摘要

目的

这项基于人群的研究旨在调查马萨诸塞州大伍斯特地区(2000年人口普查为478,000人)在1997年至2003年的四个两年期内,因急性心肌梗死(AMI)在伍斯特所有大都市医疗中心住院的居民对紧急医疗服务(EMS)的使用情况。次要研究目的是描述通过EMS转运至伍斯特大都市医院的AMI患者与通过其他方式转运的患者的人口统计学和临床特征,以及他们的住院结局。

方法

我们回顾了1997年、1999年、2001年和2003年期间在伍斯特11家大都市医疗中心住院确诊为AMI的3805例患者的病历。通过查阅医院病历获取有关EMS使用情况、患者特征和住院结局的信息。

结果

共有2693名大伍斯特地区的AMI居民(70.8%)通过救护车转运至当地医院。与通过其他方式转运的患者相比,通过救护车转运的患者年龄更大,女性比例更高,合并症患病率更高,症状特征也不同。与未通过EMS转运的患者相比,通过救护车抵达伍斯特医院的患者更有可能出现严重的临床并发症,包括心力衰竭和心源性休克,并在住院期间死亡。

结论

我们的结果表明,大多数寻求AMI治疗的大伍斯特地区居民是通过EMS转运的。通过救护车转运的患者与通过其他方式转运的患者不同,更有可能出现不良住院结局。需要进一步探讨AMI患者使用EMS的原因,并改善患者的就医行为。