• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注册器官捐赠者的优先分配。

Preferred allocation for registered organ donors.

作者信息

Trotter Griffin

机构信息

Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO 63103-2006, USA.

出版信息

Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2008 Jul;22(3):158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2008.04.001
PMID:18631870
Abstract

A shortage of transplantable organs in the United States can be traced to low rates of donation. Incentives for organ donation might partially remedy these organ shortfalls. Although incentives countervail the dominant philanthropy model, this model is neither well supported by ethical argument nor strictly applied. Preferred allocation, consisting in the practice of awarding extra priority points to previously registered organ donors who need transplants, is attractive in that it offers a potentially effective incentive while deviating less radically from entrenched practices than financial incentives. It is supported by the public and conforms to intuitions about justice and reciprocity. Moreover, it highlights moral features of the transplant community as a particular moral community within the greater medical community.

摘要

美国可移植器官的短缺可归因于器官捐赠率低。器官捐赠激励措施或许能部分弥补这些器官短缺。尽管激励措施与占主导地位的慈善模式相悖,但这种模式在伦理论证上缺乏充分支持,也未得到严格应用。优先分配,即给予先前登记的需要移植的器官捐赠者额外的优先点数,具有吸引力,因为它提供了一种潜在有效的激励措施,同时与既定做法的偏离程度比经济激励措施小。它得到公众支持,符合关于正义和互惠的直觉。此外,它凸显了移植群体作为更大医疗群体中一个特殊道德群体的道德特征。

相似文献

1
Preferred allocation for registered organ donors.注册器官捐赠者的优先分配。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2008 Jul;22(3):158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 8.
2
Professional and public attitudes toward incentives for organ donation.专业人士及公众对器官捐赠激励措施的态度。
LDI Issue Brief. 2004 Mar;9(5):1-4.
3
Ethical incentives--not payment--for organ donation.器官捐赠应给予道德激励而非金钱报酬。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 24;347(17):1382-4; author reply 1382-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200210243471721.
4
[Moderate financial incentives for organ donation].[对器官捐赠的适度经济激励措施]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Nov;132(45):2392-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-991663.
5
A matter of priority: transplanting organs preferentially to registered donors.优先事项:优先向登记捐赠者移植器官。
Rutgers Law Rev. 2003 Spring;55(3):671-740.
6
Ethical incentives--not payment--for organ donation.器官捐赠的道德激励措施——而非报酬。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 20;346(25):2002-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb013216.
7
[Ethical questions in organ transplantation].[器官移植中的伦理问题]
Vnitr Lek. 2002 Jul;48(7):667-70.
8
Incentivizing living organ donation.激励活体器官捐赠。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009 Apr;14(2):201-5. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283292582.
9
Ethical incentives--not payment--for organ donation.器官捐赠应给予道德激励而非报酬。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 24;347(17):1382-4; author reply 1382-4.
10
Incentives to promote organ donation.
Transplantation. 2004 Jan 15;77(1):159-61. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000103723.58176.D4.

引用本文的文献

1
Israel's 2008 Organ Transplant Law: continued ethical challenges to the priority points model.以色列2008年器官移植法:对优先点数模式持续存在的伦理挑战。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Mar 16;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0203-6.
2
Challenging the moral status of blood donation.质疑献血的道德地位。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Dec;22(4):340-65. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0221-4.