Arria Amelia M, Caldeira Kimberly M, Vincent Kathryn B, O'Grady Kevin E, Wish Eric D
Center for Substance Abuse Research, University of Maryland, 4321 Hartwick Rd, Suite 501, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
Prev Sci. 2008 Sep;9(3):191-201. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0095-8. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
This study describes the level of perceived harmfulness of nonmedical prescription stimulant and analgesic use in a sample of college students, and examines the prospective relationship between perceived harmfulness and subsequent nonmedical use. In addition, we explore whether the association between perceived harmfulness and nonmedical use varies by level of sensation-seeking. Personal interviews, including questions on sensation-seeking and drug use, were conducted with 1,253 first-year college students. Participants were then followed-up twice at 6-month intervals. Perceived harmfulness of nonmedical use of prescription drugs was assessed at 6 months via a web-based survey. At the 12-month follow-up interview, drug use was again assessed. Students who never had the opportunity to use prescription drugs nonmedically were excluded from all analyses. Results revealed that one in four students perceived a great risk of harm from occasional nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (25.2%) and analgesics (27.8%). As expected, low perceived harmfulness and high sensation-seeking were independently associated with increased risk of nonmedical use, holding constant demographic characteristics. The protective effect of high perceived harmfulness could be seen at all levels of sensation-seeking with one important exception: Among high sensation-seekers, perceived harmfulness was not related to nonmedical use of prescription analgesics. Perceived harmfulness appears to distinguish nonmedical users from non-users, given the opportunity to use. Increasing perceived harmfulness may be a viable prevention strategy for most students, but alternative approaches might need to be developed that are tailored to high sensation-seekers.
本研究描述了大学生样本中对非医疗处方兴奋剂和镇痛药使用的感知危害程度,并考察了感知危害与后续非医疗使用之间的前瞻性关系。此外,我们还探讨了感知危害与非医疗使用之间的关联是否因寻求刺激程度而异。对1253名大学一年级学生进行了个人访谈,包括有关寻求刺激和药物使用的问题。然后对参与者每隔6个月进行两次随访。通过基于网络的调查在6个月时评估非医疗使用处方药的感知危害。在12个月的随访访谈中,再次评估药物使用情况。从未有机会非医疗使用处方药的学生被排除在所有分析之外。结果显示,四分之一的学生认为偶尔非医疗使用处方兴奋剂(25.2%)和镇痛药(27.8%)存在很大危害风险。正如预期的那样,在人口统计学特征不变的情况下,低感知危害和高寻求刺激与非医疗使用风险增加独立相关。在所有寻求刺激程度水平上都能看到高感知危害的保护作用,但有一个重要例外:在高寻求刺激者中,感知危害与非医疗使用处方镇痛药无关。鉴于有使用机会,感知危害似乎可以区分非医疗使用者和非使用者。对于大多数学生来说,提高感知危害可能是一种可行的预防策略,但可能需要针对高寻求刺激者制定其他量身定制的方法。