• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恒河猴对行为和目标的理解。

Rhesus monkeys' understanding of actions and goals.

作者信息

Wood Justin N, Glynn David D, Hauser Marc D

机构信息

Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

出版信息

Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(1):60-8. doi: 10.1080/17470910701563442.

DOI:10.1080/17470910701563442
PMID:18633847
Abstract

A forced-choice social foraging method was used to explore how free-ranging rhesus monkeys make inferences about other individuals' goals and intentions. Subjects saw an experimenter perform an action towards one of two potential food sources, then were allowed to approach and choose one of those sources. Results showed that subjects selectively picked the food source targeted by the experimenter's action only when the action was within the rhesus' motor repertoire. Further studies explored the extent to which rhesus attend to the details of the goal as well as the means by which the goal was obtained, with results paralleling those obtained from cellular recordings of macaque mirror neurons. Monkeys' pattern of success and failure supports the hypothesis that motor areas play a functionally significant role in event parsing and action understanding.

摘要

采用强制选择社交觅食方法来探究自由放养的恒河猴如何推断其他个体的目标和意图。实验对象看到一名实验者对两个潜在食物源之一采取行动,然后被允许靠近并选择其中一个食物源。结果表明,只有当该行动在恒河猴的运动技能范围内时,实验对象才会有选择地挑选实验者行动所针对的食物源。进一步的研究探讨了恒河猴关注目标细节以及实现目标方式的程度,其结果与从猕猴镜像神经元的细胞记录中获得的结果相似。猴子的成败模式支持了运动区域在事件解析和动作理解中发挥功能上重要作用这一假设。

相似文献

1
Rhesus monkeys' understanding of actions and goals.恒河猴对行为和目标的理解。
Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(1):60-8. doi: 10.1080/17470910701563442.
2
Choosing goals, not rules: deciding among rule-based action plans.选择目标,而非规则:在基于规则的行动计划中做出决策。
Neuron. 2011 May 12;70(3):536-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.053.
3
The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations.顶叶-额皮质镜像回路的功能作用:诠释与误解。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Apr;11(4):264-74. doi: 10.1038/nrn2805. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
4
Action comprehension in non-human primates: motor simulation or inferential reasoning?非人类灵长类动物的动作理解:运动模拟还是推理?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):461-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
5
Categorization of biologically significant objects, food and gender, in rhesus monkeys. I. Behavioral study.恒河猴对具有生物学意义的物体、食物和性别的分类。I. 行为学研究
Neurosci Res. 2008 May;61(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
6
The perception of rational, goal-directed action in nonhuman primates.对非人类灵长类动物中理性的、目标导向行为的认知。
Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1402-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1144663.
7
Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis.通过镜像和心理化系统理解他人的行为与目标:一项元分析
Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 15;48(3):564-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
8
Reference frames for reach planning in macaque dorsal premotor cortex.猕猴背侧运动前皮层中伸手规划的参考框架
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;98(2):966-83. doi: 10.1152/jn.00421.2006. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
9
Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding.顶叶:从动作组织到意图理解。
Science. 2005 Apr 29;308(5722):662-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1106138.
10
Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding.腹侧运动前皮质和下顶叶皮质对动作组织和意图理解有不同的贡献。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jun;20(6):1372-85. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp200. Epub 2009 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Dogs as a model to study the emergence of concept manipulation skills for language-readiness.狗作为研究语言准备阶段概念操纵技能出现的模型。
Biol Futur. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s42977-025-00267-1.
2
A comparative study of causal perception in Guinea baboons (Papio papio) and human adults.豚尾狒狒(巴氏狒狒)与成年人类因果认知的比较研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 12;19(12):e0311294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311294. eCollection 2024.
3
The evolutionary origins of syntax: Event cognition in nonhuman primates.句法的进化起源:非人类灵长类动物的事件认知。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 24;8(25):eabn8464. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn8464. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Action Categorization in Rhesus Monkeys: discrimination of grasping from non-grasping manual motor acts.恒河猴的动作分类:对抓握与非抓握手部运动动作的辨别。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 8;7(1):15094. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15378-6.
5
Evolving the ingredients for reciprocity and spite.不断演变的互惠和恶意成分。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3255-66. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0116.