• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医院行业的专业化与医生所有制:暂停期之后

Specialization and physician-ownership in the US hospital industry: beyond the moratorium.

作者信息

Carey Kathleen, Burgess James F, Young Gary J

机构信息

VA Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, Bedford, MA 01742, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Oct;2(Pt 4):409-18. doi: 10.1017/S1744133107004227.

DOI:10.1017/S1744133107004227
PMID:18634641
Abstract

A moratorium in the US on referrals of Medicare and Medicaid patients to new cardiac, orthopedic, or surgical specialty hospitals by physician-investors was recently lifted, yet the considerable controversy stirred by this growing hospital organizational form continues. This paper calls attention to the peculiar trade-offs introduced by entry of these specialty hospitals, and highlights distinctions among their different types. New policy approaches should be open to the notion that all physician-owned specialty hospitals need not necessarily be regulated in the same way. And caution will be required not to compromise the capacity of community general hospitals to service more complex patients and to maintain the social safety net.

摘要

美国近期取消了对医生投资者将医疗保险和医疗补助患者转诊至新建心脏病、骨科或外科专科医院的禁令,但这种不断发展的医院组织形式引发的巨大争议仍在持续。本文提请注意这些专科医院的进入所带来的特殊权衡,并突出了它们不同类型之间的区别。新的政策方法应接受这样一种观念,即并非所有医生拥有的专科医院都必然要以相同方式进行监管。并且需要谨慎行事,以免损害社区综合医院为更复杂患者提供服务的能力以及维持社会安全网的能力。

相似文献

1
Specialization and physician-ownership in the US hospital industry: beyond the moratorium.美国医院行业的专业化与医生所有制:暂停期之后
Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Oct;2(Pt 4):409-18. doi: 10.1017/S1744133107004227.
2
Intolerable risk, irreparable harm: the legacy of physician-owned specialty hospitals.无法容忍的风险,无法弥补的伤害:医师拥有的专科医院的遗留问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jan-Feb;25(1):130-3. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.130.
3
CMS clarifies exceptions to specialty hospital moratorium.
Hosp Outlook. 2004 Mar-May;7(2):2.
4
Do specialty hospitals promote price competition?专科医院会促进价格竞争吗?
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2006 Jan(103):1-4.
5
Specialty hospital market proliferation: Strategic implications for general hospitals.专科医院市场扩张:对综合医院的战略影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2010 Oct-Dec;35(4):294-300. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181e04a06.
6
Specialty versus community hospitals: referrals, quality, and community benefits.专科医院与社区医院:转诊、质量及社区效益
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jan-Feb;25(1):106-18. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.1.106.
7
Moratorium nearing end? Specialty hospitals may get green light from CMS.暂停期即将结束?专科医院可能会获得医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的批准。
Mod Healthc. 2006 May 22;36(21):8-9.
8
A bottom-line debate. Opposition to doc-owned hospitals comes down to money.一场底线之争。对医生拥有的医院的反对归根结底是钱的问题。
Mod Healthc. 2006 Mar 20;36(12):20.
9
The implications of reimbursement changes for specialty hospitals.报销政策变化对专科医院的影响。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2006 Jul;60(7):42-5.
10
The attack on ancillary service providers at the federal and state level.在联邦和州层面针对辅助服务提供商的攻击。
Orthop Clin North Am. 2008 Jan;39(1):103-21, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.09.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Specialty and full-service hospitals: a comparative cost analysis.专科医院和综合服务医院:成本比较分析
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 2):1869-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00881.x. Epub 2008 Jul 25.