Miltner Richard J, Speth Thomas F, Richardson Susan D, Krasner Stuart W, Weinberg Howard S, Simmons Jane Ellen
National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(17):1133-48. doi: 10.1080/15287390802182060.
This article describes disinfection of the same source water by two commonly used disinfection treatment scenarios for purposes of subsequent concentration, chemical analysis, and toxicological evaluation. Accompanying articles in this issue of the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health describe concentration of these finished waters by reverse osmosis techniques, chemical characterization of the resulting disinfection by-product (DBP) concentrates, in vivo and in vitro toxicological results, and risk assessment methods developed to analyze data from this project. This project, called the "Four Lab Study," involved participation of scientists from four laboratories/centers of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development as well as extramural collaborators from the water industry and academia. One of the two finished waters was prepared by conventional treatment and disinfected by chlorination. The other finished water was also prepared by conventional treatment and disinfected by ozonation followed by chlorination (ozonation/postchlorination). Chlorination conditions of dose, time and temperature were similar for both treatment scenarios, allowing for a comparison. Both finished waters had acceptably low levels of particulates and bacteria, representative pH and chlorine levels, and contained numerous DBP. Known effects of ozonation were observed in that, relative to the water that was chlorinated only, the ozonated/postchlorinated water had lower concentrations of total organic halogen, trihalomethanes (THM), haloacetic acids (HAA), and higher concentrations of bromate, and aldehydes.
本文描述了通过两种常用的消毒处理方案对同一水源水进行消毒,以便后续进行浓缩、化学分析和毒理学评估。本期《毒理学与环境卫生杂志》的相关文章描述了通过反渗透技术对这些成品水进行浓缩、所得消毒副产物(DBP)浓缩物的化学特性、体内和体外毒理学结果,以及为分析该项目数据而开发的风险评估方法。这个名为“四实验室研究”的项目,有来自美国环境保护局研究与发展办公室的四个实验室/中心的科学家以及来自水行业和学术界的外部合作者参与。两种成品水中的一种通过常规处理制备并经氯化消毒。另一种成品水也通过常规处理制备,并先经臭氧化再经氯化消毒(臭氧化/后氯化)。两种处理方案的剂量、时间和温度等氯化条件相似,便于进行比较。两种成品水的颗粒物和细菌含量均低至可接受水平,pH值和氯含量具有代表性,且含有多种消毒副产物。相对于仅经氯化处理的水,臭氧化/后氯化处理的水中总有机卤、三卤甲烷(THM)、卤乙酸(HAA)的浓度较低,而溴酸盐和醛类的浓度较高,这与臭氧化已知的效果相符。