• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与圣约翰草产品标签相关的临床相关安全问题。

Clinically relevant safety issues associated with St. John's wort product labels.

作者信息

Clauson Kevin A, Santamarina Marile L, Rutledge Jennifer C

机构信息

Nova Southeastern University, College of Pharmacy-West Palm Beach, 3970 RCA Boulevard, Suite 7006A, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410, USA.

出版信息

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008 Jul 17;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-42.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6882-8-42
PMID:18637192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2483264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

St. John's wort (SJW), used to treat depression, is popular in the USA, Canada, and parts of Europe. However, there are documented interactions between SJW and prescription medications including warfarin, cyclosporine, indinavir, and oral contraceptives. One source of information about these safety considerations is the product label. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinically relevant safety information included on labeling in a nationally representative sample of SJW products from the USA.

METHODS

Eight clinically relevant safety issues were identified: drug interactions (SJW-HIV medications, SJW-immunosupressants, SJW-oral contraceptives, and SJW-warfarin), contraindications (bipolar disorder), therapeutic duplication (antidepressants), and general considerations (phototoxicity and advice to consult a healthcare professional (HCP)). A list of SJW products was identified to assess their labels. Percentages and totals were used to present findings.

RESULTS

Of the seventy-four products evaluated, no product label provided information for all 8 evaluation criteria. Three products (4.1%) provided information on 7 of the 8 criteria. Four products provided no safety information whatsoever. Percentage of products with label information was: SJW-HIV (8.1%), SJW-immunosupressants (5.4%), SJW-OCPs (8.1%), SJW-warfarin (5.4%), bipolar (1.4%), antidepressants (23.0%), phototoxicity (51.4%), and consult HCP (87.8%). Other safety-related information on labels included warnings about pregnancy (74.3%), lactation (64.9%), discontinue if adverse reaction (23.0%), and not for use in patients under 18 years old (13.5%). The average number of a priori safety issues included on a product label was 1.91 (range 0-8) for 23.9% completeness.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of SJW products fail to adequately address clinically relevant safety issues on their labeling. A few products do provide an acceptable amount of information on clinically relevant safety issues which could enhance the quality of counseling by HCPs and health store clerks. HCPs and consumers may benefit if the FDA re-examined labeling requirements for dietary supplements.

摘要

背景

圣约翰草用于治疗抑郁症,在美国、加拿大及欧洲部分地区很受欢迎。然而,圣约翰草与包括华法林、环孢素、茚地那韦和口服避孕药在内的处方药之间存在已记录的相互作用。关于这些安全考虑因素的一个信息来源是产品标签。本研究的目的是评估美国具有全国代表性的圣约翰草产品标签中包含的临床相关安全信息。

方法

确定了八个临床相关安全问题:药物相互作用(圣约翰草与抗逆转录病毒药物、圣约翰草与免疫抑制剂、圣约翰草与口服避孕药、圣约翰草与华法林)、禁忌证(双相情感障碍)、治疗重复(抗抑郁药)以及一般注意事项(光毒性和建议咨询医疗保健专业人员)。确定了一份圣约翰草产品清单以评估其标签。使用百分比和总数来呈现研究结果。

结果

在评估的74种产品中,没有产品标签涵盖所有8项评估标准的信息。三种产品(4.1%)提供了8项标准中7项的信息。四种产品未提供任何安全信息。带有标签信息的产品百分比分别为:圣约翰草与抗逆转录病毒药物(8.1%)、圣约翰草与免疫抑制剂(5.4%)、圣约翰草与口服避孕药(8.1%)、圣约翰草与华法林(5.4%)、双相情感障碍(1.4%)、抗抑郁药(23.0%)、光毒性(51.4%)以及咨询医疗保健专业人员(87.8%)。标签上的其他安全相关信息包括关于妊娠的警告(74.3%)、哺乳期(64.9%)、出现不良反应时停药(23.0%)以及18岁以下患者禁用(13.5%)。产品标签上预先设定的安全问题平均数量为1.91(范围0 - 8),完整性为23.9%。

结论

绝大多数圣约翰草产品未能在其标签上充分解决临床相关安全问题。少数产品确实提供了关于临床相关安全问题的可接受信息量,这可能会提高医疗保健专业人员和健康商店店员的咨询质量。如果美国食品药品监督管理局重新审视膳食补充剂的标签要求,医疗保健专业人员和消费者可能会受益。

相似文献

1
Clinically relevant safety issues associated with St. John's wort product labels.与圣约翰草产品标签相关的临床相关安全问题。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008 Jul 17;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-42.
2
Co-administration of St. John's wort and hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review.圣约翰草与激素避孕药的联合使用:一项系统评价。
Contraception. 2016 Dec;94(6):668-677. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Use of St. John's Wort in potentially dangerous combinations.圣约翰草与潜在危险组合的使用。
J Altern Complement Med. 2014 Jul;20(7):578-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2013.0216. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
4
Drug interaction between oral contraceptives and St. John's Wort: appropriateness of advice received from community pharmacists and health food store clerks.口服避孕药与圣约翰草之间的药物相互作用:从社区药剂师和健康食品店店员处获得的建议是否恰当。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2007 Jan-Feb;47(1):42-7. doi: 10.1331/1544-3191.47.1.42.sarino.
5
Drug interactions with St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum): a review of the clinical evidence.与圣约翰草(贯叶连翘)的药物相互作用:临床证据综述
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Mar;42(3):139-48. doi: 10.5414/cpp42139.
6
St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum): drug interactions and clinical outcomes.圣约翰草(贯叶连翘):药物相互作用及临床结果。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Oct;54(4):349-56. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01683.x.
7
Clinical drugs that interact with St. John's wort and implication in drug development.与圣约翰草相互作用的临床药物及其在药物研发中的意义。
Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(17):1723-42. doi: 10.2174/138161208784746798.
8
Hyperforin in St. John's wort drug interactions.圣约翰草中的金丝桃素与药物相互作用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;62(3):225-33. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0096-0. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
9
Clinical risks of St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) co-administration.圣约翰草(贯叶连翘)联合用药的临床风险。
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017 Oct;13(10):1047-1062. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1378342. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
Advantages and Disadvantages of Using St. John's Wort as a Treatment for Depression.使用圣约翰草治疗抑郁症的利弊。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 22;14(9):e29468. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29468. eCollection 2022 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and labeling information of products marketed for HIV-infected people in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦面向艾滋病毒感染者销售的产品的质量和标签信息。
J Public Health Afr. 2016 Dec 31;7(2):84-88. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2016.618.
2
Definition of variables required for comprehensive description of drug dosage and clinical pharmacokinetics.全面描述药物剂量和临床药代动力学所需变量的定义。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 May;73(5):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2214-6. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
In Vitro Reversible and Time-Dependent CYP450 Inhibition Profiles of Medicinal Herbal Plant Extracts Newbouldia laevis and Cassia abbreviata: Implications for Herb-Drug Interactions.药用植物提取物纽布尔德氏新苞木和短缩决明的体外可逆及时间依赖性CYP450抑制谱:对草药-药物相互作用的影响
Molecules. 2016 Jul 7;21(7):891. doi: 10.3390/molecules21070891.
4
In Vitro Evaluation of Reversible and Time-Dependent Inhibitory Effects of Kalanchoe crenata on CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 Activities.钝齿落地生根对CYP2C19和CYP3A4活性的可逆性及时间依赖性抑制作用的体外评价
Drug Metab Lett. 2015;9(1):48-62. doi: 10.2174/1872312809666150119110200.
5
Echinacea purpurea up-regulates CYP1A2, CYP3A4 and MDR1 gene expression by activation of pregnane X receptor pathway.紫锥菊通过激活孕烷X受体途径上调CYP1A2、CYP3A4和MDR1基因表达。
Xenobiotica. 2015 Mar;45(3):218-29. doi: 10.3109/00498254.2014.973930. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
Inhibition of major drug metabolizing CYPs by common herbal medicines used by HIV/AIDS patients in Africa-- implications for herb-drug interactions.非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者常用草药对主要药物代谢细胞色素P450酶的抑制作用——对草药-药物相互作用的影响
Drug Metab Lett. 2014 Jul;7(2):83-95. doi: 10.2174/1872312808666140129123210.
7
Mood disorders and complementary and alternative medicine: a literature review.心境障碍与补充和替代医学:文献综述。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:639-58. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S43419. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
A review of potential harmful interactions between anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents and Chinese herbal medicines.抗凝/抗血小板药物与中草药之间潜在有害相互作用的综述。
PLoS One. 2013 May 9;8(5):e64255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064255. Print 2013.
9
Buyer beware? Does the information provided with herbal products available over the counter enable safe use?购买需谨慎?柜台出售的草药产品所提供的信息是否能确保其安全使用?
BMC Med. 2011 Aug 9;9:94. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-94.
10
[Drug interactions in geriatric medicine].[老年医学中的药物相互作用]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2009;159(17-18):462-9. doi: 10.1007/s10354-009-0708-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing of clinical improvement and symptom resolution in the treatment of major depressive disorder. A replication of findings with the use of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Hypericum perforatum versus fluoxetine.重度抑郁症治疗中临床改善和症状缓解的时机。使用贯叶连翘与氟西汀的双盲、安慰剂对照试验对研究结果的重复验证。
Neuropsychobiology. 2007;56(2-3):132-7. doi: 10.1159/000115779. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
2
Concise review: Clinical relevance of drug drug and herb drug interactions mediated by the ABC transporter ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein).简要综述:由ABC转运蛋白ABCB1(多药耐药蛋白1,P-糖蛋白)介导的药物-药物及草药-药物相互作用的临床相关性
Oncologist. 2007 Aug;12(8):927-41. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-8-927.
3
Natural health product labels: is more information always better?天然健康产品标签:信息越多就越好吗?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
4
Variability in PXR-mediated induction of CYP3A4 by commercial preparations and dry extracts of St. John's wort.圣约翰草商业制剂和干提取物通过孕烷X受体介导诱导细胞色素P450 3A4的变异性。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2007 Aug;375(6):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00210-007-0172-8. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
5
Community identification of natural health product-drug interactions.天然健康产品与药物相互作用的社区识别。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Jul;41(7):1124-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H463. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
6
General practitioners and St. John's Wort: a question of regulation or knowledge?全科医生与圣约翰草:监管问题还是知识问题?
Complement Ther Med. 2007 Jun;15(2):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
7
Patterns and prevalence of antidepressant drug use in the German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg: a prescription-based analysis.德国巴登-符腾堡州抗抑郁药物使用模式及流行情况:基于处方的分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Oct;16(10):1153-60. doi: 10.1002/pds.1405.
8
Drug interaction between oral contraceptives and St. John's Wort: appropriateness of advice received from community pharmacists and health food store clerks.口服避孕药与圣约翰草之间的药物相互作用:从社区药剂师和健康食品店店员处获得的建议是否恰当。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2007 Jan-Feb;47(1):42-7. doi: 10.1331/1544-3191.47.1.42.sarino.
9
St John's wort for depression: time for a different perspective?圣约翰草治疗抑郁症:是时候换个视角了?
Complement Ther Med. 2006 Dec;14(4):268-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.01.003. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
10
U.S. and Canadian pharmacists' attitudes, knowledge, and professional practice behaviors toward dietary supplements: a systematic review.美国和加拿大药剂师对膳食补充剂的态度、知识及专业实践行为:一项系统综述
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006 Sep 19;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-31.