• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用计算机化的强制功能可提高订购约束措施的性能。

Use of a computerized forcing function improves performance in ordering restraints.

作者信息

Griffey Richard T, Wittels Kathleen, Gilboy Nicki, McAfee Andrew T

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110-1010, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.035. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.035
PMID:18640744
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the effect of a computerized order entry system forcing function on improving timely renewal of restraint orders.

METHODS

In this prospective study of 2 successive interventions, physicians received computerized reminders to renew or discontinue restraint orders before their expiration. The initial intervention allowed acknowledgement of this reminder without further consequence, changing at 6 months to deny computer access until addressed. We performed chart review on emergency department visits with restraint orders in 3 consecutive 6-month periods (A, B, C) separated by these 2 interventions, determining time to order renewal, number of restraint orders, renewal orders per hour in restraints, and time in restraints and evaluating variability in these values across study intervals. Statistical analysis for our primary outcome used the Mann-Whitney and variance ratio tests.

RESULTS

Median time to order renewal decreased in periods B and C versus A by 64 and 56 minutes, respectively, with variability in this measure decreasing across all periods. Mean number of restraint orders in periods B and C significantly increased versus those in A (1.46 to 1.89 to 2.34), with corresponding increases in variability. Mean renewal orders per hour in restraint significantly increased in period C versus A and B, from 0.08 to 0.23 to 0.89, with increasing variability across all periods. Decreases in median time spent in restraints observed in periods B and C versus A of 45 and 105 minutes, respectively, trended toward but did not achieve significance, with significantly decreasing variability compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

The forcing function improved restraint reordering and variability in practice and may have contributed to nonsignificant reductions observed in time in restraint.

摘要

研究目的

我们评估计算机化医嘱录入系统强制功能对改善约束医嘱及时续签的效果。

方法

在这项针对连续两次干预措施的前瞻性研究中,医生在约束医嘱到期前收到计算机提醒以续签或停用该医嘱。最初的干预措施允许对该提醒进行确认而不产生进一步后果,6个月后改为在问题解决之前拒绝计算机访问。我们对由这两次干预措施分隔的连续3个6个月期间(A、B、C)内有约束医嘱的急诊科就诊病例进行病历审查,确定医嘱续签时间、约束医嘱数量、约束状态下每小时的续签医嘱数量以及约束时间,并评估这些值在各研究期间的变异性。对我们的主要结局进行的统计分析采用了曼-惠特尼检验和方差比检验。

结果

与A期相比,B期和C期医嘱续签的中位时间分别减少了64分钟和56分钟,且该指标的变异性在所有期间均有所降低。与A期相比,B期和C期约束医嘱的平均数量显著增加(从1.46增至1.89再增至2.34),变异性也相应增加。与A期和B期相比,C期约束状态下每小时的平均续签医嘱数量显著增加,从0.08增至0.23再增至0.89,且各期间的变异性不断增加。与A期相比,B期和C期约束时间的中位时间分别减少了45分钟和105分钟,虽有下降趋势但未达到显著水平,与基线相比变异性显著降低。

结论

强制功能改善了约束医嘱的重新开具情况及实际操作中的变异性,可能促使约束时间出现了虽不显著但有所减少的情况。

相似文献

1
Use of a computerized forcing function improves performance in ordering restraints.使用计算机化的强制功能可提高订购约束措施的性能。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.035. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
2
Forcing functions: the need for restraint.强迫函数:克制的必要性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):477-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.019. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
3
Time motion study in a pediatric emergency department before and after computer physician order entry.计算机医嘱录入前后儿科急诊科的时间动作研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):462-468.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.018. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
4
The impact of a pneumatic tube and computerized physician order management on laboratory turnaround time.气动传输系统和计算机化医嘱管理对实验室周转时间的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;51(2):181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
5
Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices.工作被打断:急诊科与基层医疗办公室工作中断情况的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Aug;38(2):146-51. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.115440.
6
The use of a CPOE log for the analysis of physicians' behavior when responding to drug-duplication reminders.使用临床医嘱录入日志分析医生对药物重复提醒的反应行为。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Aug;77(8):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.002. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
7
Effects of computerized provider order entry and nursing documentation on workflow.计算机化医嘱录入与护理记录对工作流程的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):908-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00235.x. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
8
Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry.纸质书写医嘱与医生电子医嘱录入所花费时间的比较。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1207-11.
9
A controlled quality improvement trial to reduce the use of physical restraints in older hospitalized adults.一项旨在减少老年住院患者身体约束使用的对照质量改进试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Mar;62(3):541-5. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12710. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
10
Improving the efficiency and accuracy of a tablet PC interface for computerized provider order entry through usability evaluation and provision of data entry strategies.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;143:447-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and unintended consequences of hard-stop alerts in electronic health record systems: a systematic review.电子健康记录系统中强制停止警报的效果和意外后果:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Nov 1;25(11):1556-1566. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy112.
2
Managing Acute Behavioural Disturbances in the Emergency Department Using the Environment, Policies and Practices: A Systematic Review.利用环境、政策和实践管理急诊科急性行为障碍:一项系统综述。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):647-661. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.4.33411. Epub 2017 May 15.
3
Improving Quality of Emergency Care Through Integration of Mental Health.
通过整合心理健康服务提高急诊护理质量。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Apr;52(3):332-42. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9978-x. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
4
A systematic review of crisis interventions used in the emergency department: recommendations for pediatric care and research.急诊科使用的危机干预措施的系统评价:儿科护理与研究建议
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Dec;26(12):952-62. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181fe9211.