Schoenen J, De Klippel N, Giurgea S, Herroelen L, Jacquy J, Louis P, Monseu G, Vandenheede M
Department of Neurology and Headache Research Unit, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Cephalalgia. 2008 Oct;28(10):1095-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01654.x. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
Early treatment and combining a triptan with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) are thought to improve outcome during migraine attacks, possibly by counteracting the negative influence of cutaneous allodynia. The aim of this multicentre, double-blind pilot study was to evaluate the prevalence of brush allodynia and its relative influence on the efficacy of a triptan-NSAID combination compared with headache intensity at the time of treatment. In a randomized, cross-over design, 112 migraineurs treated two moderate or severe attacks with almotriptan 12.5 mg combined with either aceclofenac 100 mg or placebo. Patients used a 2-cm brush to assess cutaneous allodynia. Allodynia was reported in 34.4% of attacks. The almotriptan-aceclofenac combination was numerically superior to triptan-placebo on 2-24-h sustained pain-free (P = 0.07), 2-h pain-free (P = 0.07) and headache recurrence (P = 0.05) rates, but not on 1-h headache relief. Allodynia numerically reduced treatment success overall, but this effect was not significant for the primary outcome measures. Headache intensity had a significant negative influence on 1-h relief in both attacks (P = 0.0001 and 0.0008, chi(2)) and on 2-24-h sustained pain-free rates in triptan-placebo-treated attacks (P = 0.013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that headache intensity at treatment intake, rather than allodynia, significantly influenced most outcome measures, predominantly so in attacks treated with almotriptan and aceclofenac. In the latter, severe compared with moderate headache intensity reduced the likelihood of achieving the primary efficacy end-points [odds ratios (OR) 0.12 and 0.33], whereas allodynia was not a significant explanatory variable (OR 0.76 and 0.65). The results apply to the protocol used here and need to be confirmed in larger studies using quantitative sensory testing.
早期治疗以及将曲坦类药物与非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)联合使用被认为可改善偏头痛发作期间的预后,可能是通过抵消皮肤异常性疼痛的负面影响。这项多中心、双盲试验性研究的目的是评估刷擦性异常性疼痛的患病率及其与治疗时头痛强度相比,对曲坦类药物与NSAID联合用药疗效的相对影响。在一项随机交叉设计中,112名偏头痛患者用12.5毫克阿莫曲坦联合100毫克醋氯芬酸或安慰剂治疗两次中度或重度发作。患者使用一把2厘米长的刷子评估皮肤异常性疼痛。在34.4%的发作中报告了异常性疼痛。阿莫曲坦-醋氯芬酸组合在2至24小时持续无痛(P = 0.07)、2小时无痛(P = 0.07)和头痛复发率(P = 0.05)方面在数值上优于曲坦类药物-安慰剂组合,但在1小时头痛缓解方面并非如此。异常性疼痛在数值上总体降低了治疗成功率,但对主要结局指标而言,这种影响并不显著。头痛强度对两次发作的1小时缓解均有显著负面影响(P = 0.0001和0.0008,卡方检验),对曲坦类药物-安慰剂治疗发作的2至24小时持续无痛率也有显著负面影响(P = 0.013)。多因素逻辑回归分析证实,治疗时的头痛强度而非异常性疼痛显著影响了大多数结局指标,在阿莫曲坦和醋氯芬酸治疗的发作中影响尤为明显。在后者中,与中度头痛强度相比,重度头痛强度降低了达到主要疗效终点的可能性[比值比(OR)为0.12和0.33],而异常性疼痛并非显著的解释变量(OR为0.76和0.65)。这些结果适用于此处使用的方案,需要在使用定量感觉测试的更大规模研究中得到证实。