Suppr超能文献

一项历史对照、单臂、多中心前瞻性试验,旨在评估MonoMax缝合材料用于初次中线剖腹术后腹壁闭合的安全性和有效性。ISAAC试验 [NCT005725079]

A historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MonoMax suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy. ISSAAC-Trial [NCT005725079].

作者信息

Fischer Lars, Baumann Petra, Hüsing Johannes, Seidlmayer Christoph, Albertsmeier Markus, Franck Annette, Luntz Steffen, Seiler Christoph M, Knaebel Hanns-Peter

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2008 Jul 21;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-8-12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several randomized controlled trials have compared different suture materials and techniques for abdominal wall closure with respect to the incidence of incisional hernias after midline laparotomy and shown that it remains, irrespective of the methods used, considerably high, ranging from 9% to 20%. The development of improved suture materials which would reduce postoperative complications may help to lower its frequency.

DESIGN

This is a historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective trial to evaluate the safety of MonoMax suture material for abdominal wall closure in 150 patients with primary elective midline incisions. INSECT patients who underwent abdominal closure using Monoplus and PDS will serve as historical control group. The incidences of wound infections and of burst abdomen are defined as composite primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints are the frequency of incisional hernias within one year after operation and safety. To ensure adequate comparability in surgical performance and recruitment, the 4 largest centres of the INSECT-Trial will participate. After hospital discharge, the investigators will examine the enrolled patients again at 30 days and at 12 +/- 1 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This historically controlled, single-arm, multi-centre, prospective ISSAAC trial aims to assess whether the use of an ultra-long-lasting absorbable monofilament suture material is safe and efficient.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT005725079.

摘要

背景

多项随机对照试验比较了不同缝合材料和技术用于腹壁关闭时对中线剖腹术后切口疝发生率的影响,结果显示,无论采用何种方法,切口疝发生率仍相当高,在9%至20%之间。研发能减少术后并发症的改良缝合材料可能有助于降低其发生率。

设计

这是一项历史对照、单臂、多中心前瞻性试验,旨在评估MonoMax缝合材料用于150例择期原发性中线切口患者腹壁关闭的安全性。采用Monoplus和PDS进行腹壁关闭的INSECT患者将作为历史对照组。伤口感染和腹壁裂开的发生率被定义为复合主要终点。次要终点是术后一年内切口疝的发生率和安全性。为确保手术操作和招募的充分可比性,INSECT试验的4个最大中心将参与。出院后,研究人员将在术后30天以及12±1个月时再次检查入组患者。

结论

这项历史对照、单臂、多中心前瞻性ISSAAC试验旨在评估使用超长效可吸收单丝缝合材料是否安全有效。

试验注册

NCT005725079

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
[Incisional hernia].[切口疝]
Chirurg. 2005 Sep;76(9):897-909; quiz 910. doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1072-4.
5
Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia.吸烟是切口疝的一个风险因素。
Arch Surg. 2005 Feb;140(2):119-23. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.2.119.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验