Kocaman Sinan Altan, Sahinarslan Asife, Arslan Uğur, Timurkaynak Timur
Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Besevler 06500, Ankara, Turkey.
Atherosclerosis. 2009 Mar;203(1):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a method which is used to identify the angiographically intermediate lesions requiring revascularization. However, physiological importance and clinical usability of delta (Delta) FFR, the difference between FFR in baseline conditions (FFRbase, resting) and after adenosine administration (FFRmin, hyperemic), is currently unknown. We aimed to investigate whether DeltaFFR may be helpful in the identification of the lesion severity and predictability of long-term prognosis.
We enrolled 123 consecutive patients with an intermediate lesion (40-70% stenosis) at LAD in this study. The patients were divided into three groups according to FFRmin results (group I: FFR>0.80, n=71; group II: FFR between 0.75 and 0.80, n=28; group III: FFR<0.75, n=24). We followed the patients for a mean duration of 36+/-17 months for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). For the sensitivity and the specificity of DeltaFFR to detect the lesion severity, the area under ROC curve was found as 0.873 (95% CI: 0.788-0.958, P<0.001). When >or=15 is accepted as the cut-off value for DeltaFFR, the specificity was 95%, the sensitivity was 59% for lesion severity. When we compared the predictability of MACE by FFRmin and DeltaFFR, there is no difference in FFRmin groups (FFR<0.75, 0.75-0.80 and FFR>0.80) (29%, 46% and 30%, respectively, P=0.247). However, between the groups which were determined according to cut-off values for DeltaFFR (DeltaFFR<10; DeltaFFR, 10-15; DeltaFFR>or=15) among the patients with FFR<or=0.80, MACE was significantly different (73%, 44%, 11%; respectively, P=0.003).
DeltaFFR may represent the vascular ischemic compensatory capacity to a significant lesion and this response capacity shows the severity of the lesion with high specificity. Decreased and insufficient vascular response capacity to a significantly lesion relates to the poor long-term clinical prognosis. DeltaFFR may be helpful in the identification of the lesion severity in the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions; it can be used as a guide for revascularization decision and in predictability of long-term clinical prognosis.
血流储备分数(FFR)是一种用于识别需要进行血运重建的血管造影显示为中等病变的方法。然而,目前尚不清楚基线状态下的FFR(FFRbase,静息状态)与腺苷给药后(FFRmin,充血状态)的FFR差值即ΔFFR的生理重要性和临床实用性。我们旨在研究ΔFFR是否有助于识别病变严重程度以及预测长期预后。
本研究纳入了123例连续的左前降支存在中等病变(狭窄40%-70%)的患者。根据FFRmin结果将患者分为三组(I组:FFR>0.80,n=71;II组:FFR在0.75至0.80之间,n=28;III组:FFR<0.75,n=24)。我们对患者进行了平均36±17个月的随访,观察主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。对于ΔFFR检测病变严重程度的敏感性和特异性,ROC曲线下面积为0.873(95%CI:0.788-0.958,P<0.001)。当将ΔFFR≥15作为病变严重程度的截断值时,特异性为95%,敏感性为59%。当我们比较FFRmin和ΔFFR对MACE的预测能力时,FFRmin各分组(FFR<0.75、0.75-0.80和FFR>0.80)之间无差异(分别为29%、46%和30%,P=0.247)。然而,在FFR≤0.80的患者中,根据ΔFFR截断值确定的分组(ΔFFR<10;ΔFFR,10-15;ΔFFR≥15)之间MACE有显著差异(分别为73%、44%、11%;P=0.003)。
ΔFFR可能代表了血管对显著病变的缺血代偿能力,这种反应能力以高特异性显示病变的严重程度。血管对显著病变的反应能力降低和不足与不良的长期临床预后相关。ΔFFR在评估中等冠状动脉病变时可能有助于识别病变严重程度;它可作为血运重建决策的指导以及长期临床预后预测的指标。