Suppr超能文献

医院类型和规模对胃癌及胰腺癌淋巴结评估的影响

Effect of hospital type and volume on lymph node evaluation for gastric and pancreatic cancer.

作者信息

Bilimoria Karl Y, Talamonti Mark S, Wayne Jeffrey D, Tomlinson James S, Stewart Andrew K, Winchester David P, Ko Clifford Y, Bentrem David J

机构信息

Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2008 Jul;143(7):671-8; discussion 678. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.7.671.

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

For gastric and pancreatic cancer, regional lymph node evaluation is important to accurately stage disease in a patient and may be associated with improved survival. We hypothesized that National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated institutions, and high-volume hospitals examine more lymph nodes for gastric and pancreatic malignant neoplasms than do low-volume centers and community hospitals.

DESIGN

Volume-outcome study.

SETTING

Academic research.

PATIENTS

Using the National Cancer Data Base (January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004), patients were identified who underwent resection for gastric (n = 3088) and pancreatic (n = 1130 [pancreaticoduodenectomy only]) cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of hospital type and volume on nodal evaluation (>or=15 nodes).

RESULTS

Only 23.2% of patients with gastric cancer and 16.4% of patients with pancreatic cancer in the United States underwent evaluation of at least 15 lymph nodes. Patients undergoing surgery had more lymph nodes examined at NCCN-NCI hospitals than at community hospitals (median, 12 vs 6 for gastric cancer and 9 vs 6 for pancreatic cancer; P < .001). Patients at highest-volume hospitals had more lymph nodes examined than patients at low-volume hospitals (median, 10 vs 6 for gastric cancer and 8 vs 6 for pancreatic cancer; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing surgery at NCCN-NCI and high-volume hospitals were more likely to have at least 15 lymph nodes evaluated compared with patients undergoing surgery at community hospitals and low-volume centers (P < .001 and P =.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal examination is important for staging, adjuvant therapy decision making, and clinical trial stratification. Moreover, differences in nodal evaluation may contribute to improved long-term outcomes at NCCN-NCI centers and high-volume hospitals for patients with gastric and pancreatic cancer.

摘要

假设

对于胃癌和胰腺癌,区域淋巴结评估对于准确分期患者疾病很重要,且可能与生存率提高相关。我们假设,与低容量中心和社区医院相比,美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)、美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)指定机构以及高容量医院对胃癌和胰腺恶性肿瘤检查的淋巴结更多。

设计

容量-结局研究。

地点

学术研究。

患者

利用国家癌症数据库(2003年1月1日至2004年12月31日),确定了接受胃癌切除术(n = 3088)和胰腺癌切除术(n = 1130[仅胰十二指肠切除术])的患者。

主要结局指标

采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估医院类型和容量对淋巴结评估(≥15个淋巴结)的影响。

结果

在美国,只有23.2%的胃癌患者和16.4%的胰腺癌患者接受了至少15个淋巴结的评估。接受手术的患者在NCCN-NCI医院检查的淋巴结比在社区医院更多(中位数,胃癌为12个对6个,胰腺癌为9个对6个;P <.001)。高容量医院的患者比低容量医院的患者检查的淋巴结更多(中位数,胃癌为10个对6个,胰腺癌为8个对6个;P <.001)。在多变量分析中,与在社区医院和低容量中心接受手术的患者相比,在NCCN-NCI和高容量医院接受手术的患者更有可能评估至少15个淋巴结(分别为P <.001和P =.02)。

结论

淋巴结检查对于分期、辅助治疗决策和临床试验分层很重要。此外,淋巴结评估的差异可能有助于NCCN-NCI中心和高容量医院的胃癌和胰腺癌患者获得更好的长期结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验