Bilimoria Karl Y, Talamonti Mark S, Wayne Jeffrey D, Tomlinson James S, Stewart Andrew K, Winchester David P, Ko Clifford Y, Bentrem David J
Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Arch Surg. 2008 Jul;143(7):671-8; discussion 678. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.7.671.
For gastric and pancreatic cancer, regional lymph node evaluation is important to accurately stage disease in a patient and may be associated with improved survival. We hypothesized that National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated institutions, and high-volume hospitals examine more lymph nodes for gastric and pancreatic malignant neoplasms than do low-volume centers and community hospitals.
Volume-outcome study.
Academic research.
Using the National Cancer Data Base (January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004), patients were identified who underwent resection for gastric (n = 3088) and pancreatic (n = 1130 [pancreaticoduodenectomy only]) cancer.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of hospital type and volume on nodal evaluation (>or=15 nodes).
Only 23.2% of patients with gastric cancer and 16.4% of patients with pancreatic cancer in the United States underwent evaluation of at least 15 lymph nodes. Patients undergoing surgery had more lymph nodes examined at NCCN-NCI hospitals than at community hospitals (median, 12 vs 6 for gastric cancer and 9 vs 6 for pancreatic cancer; P < .001). Patients at highest-volume hospitals had more lymph nodes examined than patients at low-volume hospitals (median, 10 vs 6 for gastric cancer and 8 vs 6 for pancreatic cancer; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing surgery at NCCN-NCI and high-volume hospitals were more likely to have at least 15 lymph nodes evaluated compared with patients undergoing surgery at community hospitals and low-volume centers (P < .001 and P =.02, respectively).
Nodal examination is important for staging, adjuvant therapy decision making, and clinical trial stratification. Moreover, differences in nodal evaluation may contribute to improved long-term outcomes at NCCN-NCI centers and high-volume hospitals for patients with gastric and pancreatic cancer.
对于胃癌和胰腺癌,区域淋巴结评估对于准确分期患者疾病很重要,且可能与生存率提高相关。我们假设,与低容量中心和社区医院相比,美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)、美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)指定机构以及高容量医院对胃癌和胰腺恶性肿瘤检查的淋巴结更多。
容量-结局研究。
学术研究。
利用国家癌症数据库(2003年1月1日至2004年12月31日),确定了接受胃癌切除术(n = 3088)和胰腺癌切除术(n = 1130[仅胰十二指肠切除术])的患者。
采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估医院类型和容量对淋巴结评估(≥15个淋巴结)的影响。
在美国,只有23.2%的胃癌患者和16.4%的胰腺癌患者接受了至少15个淋巴结的评估。接受手术的患者在NCCN-NCI医院检查的淋巴结比在社区医院更多(中位数,胃癌为12个对6个,胰腺癌为9个对6个;P <.001)。高容量医院的患者比低容量医院的患者检查的淋巴结更多(中位数,胃癌为10个对6个,胰腺癌为8个对6个;P <.001)。在多变量分析中,与在社区医院和低容量中心接受手术的患者相比,在NCCN-NCI和高容量医院接受手术的患者更有可能评估至少15个淋巴结(分别为P <.001和P =.02)。
淋巴结检查对于分期、辅助治疗决策和临床试验分层很重要。此外,淋巴结评估的差异可能有助于NCCN-NCI中心和高容量医院的胃癌和胰腺癌患者获得更好的长期结局。